Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486642›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Evaluation of a Gene Expression Profiling Assay in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Aaron W Kangas-Dick, Alissa Greenbaum, Victor Gall, Roman Groisberg, Janice Mehnert, Chunxia Chen, Dirk F Moore, Adam C Berger, Vadim Koshenkov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma: Overview and Updates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Gene Signatures and Oncology Treatment Implications.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron W Kangas-DickDivision of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ), New Brunswick, NJ, USA. ak1777@cinj.rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-2054
Alissa GreenbaumDivision of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ), New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Victor GallDivision of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ), New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Roman GroisbergDivision of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Janice MehnertDivision of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Chunxia ChenDivision of Biometrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Dirk F MooreDivision of Biometrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Adam C BergerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ), New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Vadim KoshenkovDivision of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CINJ), New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of deaths from cutaneous melanoma occur among patients with an initial diagnosis of stage 1 or 2 disease. The Decision-Dx Melanoma (DDM) 31-gene assay attempts to stratify these patients by risk of recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate this assay in a large single-institution series.

methodsA retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery for melanoma at a large academic cancer center with DDM results was performed. Patient demographics, tumor pathologic characteristics, sentinel node status, gene expression profile (GEP) class, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were reviewed. The primary outcomes were recurrence of melanoma and distant metastatic recurrence.

resultsData from 361 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 15 months. Sentinel node biopsy was performed for 75.9% (n = 274) of the patients, 53 (19.4%) of whom tested positive. Overall, 13.6% (n = 49) of the patients had recurrence, and 8% (n = 29) had distant metastatic recurrence. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were respectively 85% and 75% for the class 1A group, 74% and 47% for the class 1B/class 2A group, and 54% and 45% for the class 2B group. Increased Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitoses, sentinel node biopsy positivity, and GEP class 2B status were significantly associated with RFS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, only Breslow thickness and ulceration were associated with RFS (p < 0.003), and only Breslow thickness was associated with DMFS (p < 0.001).

conclusionGenetic profiling of cutaneous melanoma can assist in predicting recurrence and help determine the need for close surveillance. However, traditional pathologic factors remain the strongest independent predictors of recurrence risk.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33486642
OpenAlexW3124090737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.