Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486640›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2021

Efficacy of a Voluntary Self-exclusion Reinstatement Tutorial for Problem Gamblers.

Nigel E Turner, Jing Shi, Janine Robinson, Steve McAvoy, Sherald Sanchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gambling Harm-Minimisation Tools and Their Impact on Gambling Behaviour: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Qualitative Experience of Self-Exclusion Programs: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nigel E TurnerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. Nigel.Turner@camh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1035-2064
Jing ShiCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Janine RobinsonThe Responsible Gambling Council of Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Steve McAvoyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Sherald SanchezCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary self-exclusion programs allow gamblers to voluntarily be denied access to gambling venues for an agreed upon period. Many people who self-exclude decide to return to gambling venues after the exclusion period has ended, however people who reinstate may be at risk for the recurrence of gambling problems. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of a tutorial created with the intent of reducing the risk of harm to those who reinstate. People who wished to be reinstated were asked to complete a survey on gambling related issues and then watch the tutorial video. An online video-based tutorial designed to reduce gambling related harm and to provide information about treatment services was developed. The control group (N = 131) consisted of people who reinstated in the year prior to the implementation of the online tutorial. The experimental intervention group (N = 104) were those who reinstated after the implementation of the online tutorial. There was a significant decrease in gambling and problem gambling comparing pre-exclusion to during exclusion in both the experimental and control group. Furthermore, this drop in gambling problem was sustained for 6-months and 12-months after reinstatement. However, no main effect or interaction was found that supported the efficacy of the tutorial. Self-exclusion by itself was associated with a sustained reduction in problem gambling. There was no significant evidence that the educational tutorial had any additional impact on the reinstatement process.

Indexed as

GamblingHumansVoluntary ProgramsDisordered gamblingGambling interventionPathological gamblingProblem gamblingSelf-exclusion

Identifiers

PMID33486640
PMCPMC7825392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.