Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486605›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Improving quality of life in pancreatic cancer patients following high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in two European centers.

Milka Marinova, Hyuliya Feradova, Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona, Rupert Conrad, Tolga Tonguc, Marcus Thudium, Marc U Becher, Zhou Kun, Grigor Gorchev, Slavcho Tomov and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. From questionnaires to single items: independent use of a walking measure in patients after thoracic surgery.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles for Cancer Treatment-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Image-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound, A Novel Application for Interventional Nuclear Medicine?Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Milka MarinovaClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Hyuliya FeradovaHIFU Center, University St. Marina Hospital, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Maria A Gonzalez-CarmonaClinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rupert ConradClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tolga TongucClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Marcus ThudiumDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marc U BecherClinic for Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Zhou KunClinical Center for Tumor Therapy, 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Grigor GorchevHIFU Center, University St. Marina Hospital, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Slavcho TomovHIFU Center, University St. Marina Hospital, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Christian P StrassburgClinic for Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrike AttenbergerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Hans H SchildClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
Dobromir Dimitrov *HIFU Center, University St. Marina Hospital, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Holger M Strunk *Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany. strunk@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-4063
University Hospital Bonn · DEMedical University Pleven · BGChongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPancreatic cancer patients often have a high symptom burden, significantly impairing patients' quality of life (QOL). Nevertheless, there are hardly any reports on the impact of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) on the QOL of treated patients. For the first time, this study evaluated the effect of HIFU on QOL and compared these results in two European centers.

methodsEighty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer underwent HIFU (50 in Germany, 30 in Bulgaria). Clinical assessment included evaluation of QOL and symptoms using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after HIFU. Pain intensity was additionally evaluated with the numerical rating score (NRS).

resultsCompared to baseline, global health significantly improved 3 and 6 months after HIFU treatment (p = 0.02). Functional subscales including physical, emotional, and social functioning were considerably improved at 6 months (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, and p = 0.01, respectively) as were leading symptom pain (p = 0.04 at 6 months), fatigue (p = 0.03 at 3 and p = 0.01 at 6 months), and appetite loss (p = 0.01 at 6 months). Moreover, pain intensity measured by NRS revealed effective and strong pain relief at all time points (p < 0.001). Reported effects were independent of tumor stage, metastatic status, and country of treatment.

conclusionsThis study showed that HIFU represents an effective treatment option of advanced pancreatic cancer improving QOL by increasing global health and mitigation of physical complaints with a low rate of side effects, independent of the examiner. Therefore, HIFU is a worthwhile additional treatment besides systemic palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care in management of this aggressive disease. KEY POINTS: • In a prospective two-center study, it was shown that HIFU represents an effective treatment option of advanced pancreatic cancer improving QOL. • HIFU in pancreatic cancer patients is associated with a low rate of side effects, independent of the performer. • HIFU is a worthwhile additional treatment besides systemic palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care in management of this aggressive disease.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationPancreatic NeoplasmsGermanyHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeHigh-intensity focused ultrasound ablationPain managementPalliative carePancreatic neoplasmsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID33486605
OpenAlexW3121605861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.