Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486590›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Correlation Between EAT-10 and Aspiration Risk Differs by Dysphagia Etiology.

Rebecca S Bartlett, Mary K Kenz, Heidi A Wayment, Susan L Thibeault

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Age-defying swallowing.Frontiers in aging · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic utility of different dysphagia screening tools to detect dysphagia in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca S BartlettNorthern Arizona University, Health Professions, Rm 313, 208 E. Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. rebecca.bartlett@nau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-712X
Mary K KenzNorthern Arizona University, Health Professions, 208 E. Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Heidi A WaymentPsychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Bldg 60, Rm #313, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Susan L ThibeaultDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Northern Arizona University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agreement between self-reported dysphagic symptoms and actual swallowing physiology can vary widely across individuals. The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is a self-report questionnaire commonly used to identify individuals with oropharyngeal dysphagia, but its interpretation for highly prevalent populations is poorly defined. Our primary objective was to determine if correlation strength between EAT-10 and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores differed by dysphagia etiology. Our secondary objective was to identify clinical factors that were associated with a mismatch between EAT-10 scores and videofluoroscopic findings. Outpatients with Parkinson disease (PD), stroke, and/or head and neck cancer (HNC) who completed EAT-10 and underwent videofluoroscopy were included (n = 203). EAT-10/PAS correlations were calculated by dysphagia etiology. We found that across the sample, higher EAT-10 scores were significantly correlated to higher PAS scores (r

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersHead and Neck NeoplasmsDeglutitionHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEAT-10Head and neck cancerParkinson diseasePASStroke

Identifiers

PMID33486590
OpenAlexW3122018049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.