Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486585›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021

A Simple Tool to Improve Visualization of the Vocal Cords on Translaryngeal Ultrasound in Male Patients.

P Knyazeva, M K Walz, P F Alesina

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P KnyazevaDepartment of Surgery and Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany. p.kniazeva@kem-med.com.
M K WalzDepartment of Surgery and Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany.
P F AlesinaDepartment of Surgery and Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany.
Kliniken Essen-Mitte · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaryngeal ultrasound has been increasingly used for the evaluation of the vocal cords mobility after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the method are reported to be higher than 80%. Nevertheless, the visualization rate in male patients remains low; therefore, ultrasound is not attractive for the perioperative workup in those patients. In the present study, we evaluate the ability to improve the visualization rate for male patients by using a gel pad as an interface between the skin and the ultrasound probe. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 2018 and January 2019, 92 male patients (mean age 49 years; range: 20-80 years) referred to our hospital with different thyroid pathologies received a laryngeal ultrasound without (TLUS) and subsequently with gel pad (G-TLUS). TLUS was performed by B-scan (probe 5-13 MHz, aperture 40 mm). The data were prospectively collected and statistically analyzed.

resultsThe visualization rate in the TLUS group was 35% (32 out of 92 patients). The use of the gel pad could increase the rate to 78% (p < 0.0001). For both groups, visualization rates are lower in older patients (> 50 years) compared to younger individuals (TLUS: 25% vs. 45%, p < 0.05; G-TLUS: 75% vs 82%, p = 0.45).

conclusionThe gel pad significantly improves the vocal cord visualization rate in male patients and should be used routinely.

Indexed as

Vocal Cord ParalysisVocal CordsAgedHumansLaryngoscopyMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID33486585
OpenAlexW3122352595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.