ArticleNeuroradiology2021
Effective connectivity alteration according to recurrence in transient global amnesia.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence of Small Vessel Disease in Patients with Transient Global Amnesia Based on the Peak Width of Skeletonized Mean Diffusivity.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Altered cerebellar volumes and intrinsic cerebellar networks in patients with transient global amnesia.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- Involvement of the default mode network in patients with transient global amnesia: multilayer network.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Guideline "Transient Global Amnesia (TGA)" of the German Society of Neurology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie): S1-guideline.Neurological research and practice · 2023Article
- Transient Global Amnesia Recurrence: Prevalence and Risk Factor Meta-analysis.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate alterations in structural covariance network and effective connectivity of the intrahippocampal circuit in patients with transient global amnesia (TGA). We also investigated whether there were differences of them according to recurrence.
methodsWe enrolled 88 patients with TGA and 50 healthy controls. We classified patients with TGA into two groups: the single event group (N = 77) and recurrent events group (N = 11). We performed volumetric analysis using the FreeSurfer program and structural covariance network analysis based on the structural volumes using a graph theoretical analysis in patients with TGA and healthy controls. The effective connectivity of the intrahippocampal circuit was also evaluated using structural equation modeling.
resultsThere were no significant differences between patients with all TGA events/a single TGA event and healthy controls with regard to global structural covariance network. However, patients with recurrent events had significant alterations in global structural covariance network with a decrease in the small-worldness index (0.907 vs. 0.970, p = 0.032). In patients with all events/a single, there were alterations in effective connectivity from the entorhinal cortex to CA4, only. However, in patients with recurrent events, there were alterations in effective connectivity from the subiculum to the fimbria as well as from the entorhinal cortex to CA4 in bilateral hemispheres.
conclusionOur study revealed significant alterations in structural covariance network and disruption of the intrahippocampal circuit in patients with TGA compared to healthy controls, which is more prominent when amnestic events recurred. It could be related to the pathogenesis of TGA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.