Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33486066›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2021

Making science computable: Developing code systems for statistics, study design, and risk of bias.

Brian S Alper, Joanne Dehnbostel, Muhammad Afzal, Vignesh Subbian, Andrey Soares, Ilkka Kunnamo, Khalid Shahin, Robert C McClure, COVID-19 Knowledge Accelerator (COKA) Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Making guidelines computable.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HL7 FHIR-based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian S AlperComputable Publishing LLC, Ipswich, MA, United States. Electronic address: balper@computablepublishing.com.
Joanne DehnbostelComputable Publishing LLC, Ipswich, MA, United States. Electronic address: jdehnbostel@computablepublishing.com.
Muhammad AfzalSejong University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: mafzal@sejong.ac.kr.
Vignesh SubbianThe University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States. Electronic address: vsubbian@arizona.edu.
Andrey SoaresUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address: andrey.soares@cuanschutz.edu.
Ilkka KunnamoDuodecim Medical Publications Ltd, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: ilkka.kunnamo@duodecim.fi.
Khalid ShahinComputable Publishing LLC, Ipswich, MA, United States. Electronic address: kshahin@computablepublishing.com.
Robert C McClureMD Partners, Inc., Lafayette, CO, United States. Electronic address: rmcclure@mdpartners.com.
COVID-19 Knowledge Accelerator (COKA) Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis led a group of scientific and informatics experts to accelerate development of an infrastructure for electronic data exchange for the identification, processing, and reporting of scientific findings. The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR®) standard which is overcoming the interoperability problems in health information exchange was extended to evidence-based medicine (EBM) knowledge with the EBMonFHIR project. A 13-step Code System Development Protocol was created in September 2020 to support global development of terminologies for exchange of scientific evidence. For Step 1, we assembled expert working groups with 55 people from 26 countries by October 2020. For Step 2, we identified 23 commonly used tools and systems for which the first version of code systems will be developed. For Step 3, a total of 368 non-redundant concepts were drafted to become display terms for four code systems (Statistic Type, Statistic Model, Study Design, Risk of Bias). Steps 4 through 13 will guide ongoing development and maintenance of these terminologies for scientific exchange. When completed, the code systems will facilitate identifying, processing, and reporting research results and the reliability of those results. More efficient and detailed scientific communication will reduce cost and burden and improve health outcomes, quality of life, and patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional satisfaction. We hope the achievements reached thus far will outlive COVID-19 and provide an infrastructure to make science computable for future generations. Anyone may join the effort at https://www.gps.health/covid19_knowledge_accelerator.html.

Indexed as

BiasAdolescentAdultAgedCommunicationCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCode systemEvidence-based medicineOntologyResearch literatureScience communicationTerminology

Identifiers

PMID33486066
PMCPMC9387176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.