ArticleMedical engineering & physics2021
Design and analysis of a compliant 3D printed energy harvester housing for knee implants.
Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Self-Powered Load Imbalance Detection for Instrumented Knee Implants Using Quadrant Triboelectric Energy Harvesters.IEEE sensors journal · 2024Article
- The application of impantable sensors in the musculoskeletal system: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Sensor Technology in Fracture Healing.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Bioelectronic multifunctional bone implants: recent trends.Bioelectronic medicine · 2022Review
- Design of a Cylindrical Compliant Linear Guide with Decoupling Parallelogram Mechanisms.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Self-Powered Load Sensing Circuitry for Total Knee Replacement.IEEE sensors journal · 2021Article
- Effect of Dielectric Material and Package Stiffness on the Power Generation in a Packaged Triboelectric Energy Harvesting System for Total Knee Replacement.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Instrumented implants have the potential to detect abnormal loading patterns which could be deleterious to implant longevity, indicating a need for intervention which could reduce the need for more complicated revision surgeries. Reliably powering such devices has been one obstacle preventing widespread usage of instrumented implants in clinical populations. This study presents a 3D-printed titanium interpositional device designed to integrate triboelectric generators (TEGs) into a commercially available total knee replacement (TKR). The device's stiffness, durability, and efficacy as a TEG housing were determined. Surprisingly, the stiffness of the 3D printed prototype was 73% less than what was calculated in a corresponding computational model, and under long-term durability testing failed after approximately 30,000 cycles of simulated gait loading. Under cyclical compressive loading, TEGs embedded in the device were able to generate 10.05 μW of power which is sufficient to run the frontend electronics for a load measurement system. The stiffness discrepancy between the computational and experimental models and the premature fatigue failure are suspected to be a result of internal porosity, unfused material and surface roughness of the 3D printed metal. Further refinements in design and manufacturing of the compliant device are required to improve its durability and TEG power output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.