Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33485339›Full record

ReviewReproductive health2021

Towards achieving the family planning targets in the African region: a rapid review of task sharing policies.

Leopold Ouedraogo, Desire Habonimana, Triphonie Nkurunziza, Asmani Chilanga, Elamin Hayfa, Tall Fatim, Nancy Kidula, Ghislaine Conombo, Assumpta Muriithi, Pamela Onyiah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. 'Global health action · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Are men clients, catalysts or controllers of family planning?Frontiers in global women's health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leopold OuedraogoReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo. ouedraogol@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5842-1842
Desire HabonimanaDepartment of Community Medicine, Research and Innovation Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-5558
Triphonie NkurunzizaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
Asmani ChilangaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, Intercountry Support Team for West Africa, World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Elamin HayfaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, Intercountry Support Team for East and Southern Africa, World Health Organization, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tall FatimReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, Intercountry Support Team for West Africa, World Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Nancy KidulaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, Intercountry Support Team for East and Southern Africa, World Health Organization, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ghislaine ConomboReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, Intercountry Support Team for Central Africa, World Health Organization, Libreville, Gabon.
Assumpta MuriithiReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
Pamela OnyiahReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanding access and use of effective contraception is important in achieving universal access to reproductive healthcare services, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as those in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Shortage of trained healthcare providers is an important contributor to increased unmet need for contraception in SSA. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends task sharing as an important strategy to improve access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services by addressing shortage of healthcare providers. This study explores the status, successes, challenges and impacts of the implementation of task sharing for family planning in five SSA countries. This evidence is aimed at promoting the implementation and scale-up of task sharing programmes in SSA countries by WHO. METHODOLOGY AND

findingsWe employed a rapid programme review (RPR) methodology to generate evidence on task sharing for family planning programmes from five SSA countries namely, Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Nigeria. This involved a desk review of country task sharing policy documents, implementation plans and guidelines, annual sexual and reproductive health programme reports, WHO regional meeting reports on task sharing for family planning; and information from key informants on country background, intervention packages, impact, enablers, challenges and ways forward on task sharing for family planning. The findings indicate mainly the involvement of community health workers, midwives and nurses in the task sharing programmes with training in provision of contraceptive pills and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). Results indicate an increase in family planning indicators during the task shifting implementation period. For instance, injectable contraceptive use increased more than threefold within six months in Burkina Faso; contraceptive prevalence rate doubled with declines in total fertility and unmet need for contraception in Ethiopia; and uptake of LARC increased in Ghana and Nigeria. Some barriers to successful implementation include poor retention of lower cadre providers, inadequate documentation, and poor data systems.

conclusionsTask sharing plays a role in increasing contraceptive uptake and holds promise in promoting universal access to family planning in the SSA region. Evidence from this RPR is helpful in elaborating country policies and scale-up of task sharing for family planning programmes.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentBurkina FasoCote d'IvoireEthiopiaFamily Planning ServicesFemaleGhanaHumansNigeriaPolicyPregnancyQuality ImprovementAfrican regionFamily planningTask sharingWorld health organisation

Identifiers

PMID33485339
PMCPMC7825212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.