Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33485116›Full record

ArticleClinical imaging2021

Utility of visual coronary artery calcification on non-cardiac gated thoracic CT in predicting clinical severity and outcome in COVID-19.

Anirudh Venugopalan Nair, Devendra Kumar, Santosh Kumar Yadav, Pankaj Nepal, Bamil Jacob, Mahmoud Al-Heidous

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Correlation between coronary artery calcification and COVID-19.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting the Disease Severity of Virus Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anirudh Venugopalan NairAl Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. Electronic address: dranirudhnair@gmail.com.
Devendra KumarAl Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. Electronic address: Pgi_devu@yahoo.com.
Santosh Kumar YadavSidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar. Electronic address: syadav@sidra.org.
Pankaj NepalFrank H Netter School Of Medicine, Quinnipac University, CT, USA. Electronic address: Pankaj.nepal@hhchealth.org.
Bamil JacobAl Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. Electronic address: BJacob7@hamad.qa.
Mahmoud Al-HeidousAl Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. Electronic address: MHEIDOUS@hamad.qa.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAQuinnipiac University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of visual-coronary artery calcification on non-cardiac gated CT in COVID-19 patients could provide an objective approach to rapidly identify and triage clinically severe patients for early hospital admission to avert worse prognosis. PURPOSE: To ascertain the role of semi-quantitative scoring in visual-coronary artery calcification score (V-CACS) for predicting the clinical severity and outcome in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND

methodsWith institutional review board approval this study included 67 COVID-19 confirmed patients who underwent non-cardiac gated CT chest in an inpatient setting. Two blinded radiologist (Radiologist-1 &2) assessed the V-CACS, CT Chest severity score (CT-SS). The clinical data including the requirement for oxygen support, assisted ventilation, ICU admission and outcome was assessed, and patients were clinically subdivided depending on clinical severity. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. ROC curves analysis is performed for the assessment of performance and Pearson correlation were performed to looks for the associations.

resultsV-CACS cut off value of 3 (82.67% sensitivity and 54.55% specificity; AUC 0.75) and CT-SS with a cut off value of 21.5 (95.7% sensitivity and 63.6% specificity; AUC 0.87) are independent predictors for clinical severity and also the need for ICU admission or assisted ventilation. The pooling of both CT-SS and V-CACS (82.67% sensitivity and 86.4% specificity; AUC 0.92) are more reliable in terms of predicting the primary outcome of COVID-19 patients. On regression analysis, V-CACS and CT-SS are individual independent predictors of clinical severity in COVID-19 (Odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.99-2.98; p = 0.05 and Odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; p = 0.001 respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) for pooled V-CACS and CT-SS was 0.96 (95% CI 0.84-0.98) which correctly predicted 82.1% cases.

conclusionLogistic regression model using pooled Visual-Coronary artery calcification score and CT Chest severity score in non-cardiac gated CT can predict clinical severity and outcome in patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCOVID-19Vascular CalcificationCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedClinical severityCoronary artery calcificationCOVID-19CT chest severity score

Identifiers

PMID33485116
PMCPMC7834505
OpenAlexW3122023837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.