ArticleClinical imaging2021
Utility of visual coronary artery calcification on non-cardiac gated thoracic CT in predicting clinical severity and outcome in COVID-19.
Article in Clinical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computed tomography severity score as a predictor of disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on coronary calcifications in COVID-19.Emergency radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Coronary artery calcification is associated with reduced survival in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the MaastrICCht cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of coronary calcification detected via non-electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography in patients with cardiovascular disease: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Correlation between coronary artery calcification and COVID-19.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024Article
- Utility of chest radiograph severity scoring in emergency department for predicting outcomes in COVID-19: A study of 1275 patients.Clinical imaging · 2023Article
- Benign incidental cardiac findings in chest and cardiac CT imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2-Induced Amyloidgenesis: Not One, but Three Hypotheses for Cerebral COVID-19 Outcomes.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Lung Opacity and Coronary Artery Calcium Score: A Combined Tool for Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction in COVID-19 Patients.Academic radiology · 2022Article
- Predicting the Disease Severity of Virus Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement with the CO-RADS lexicon for CT chest reporting in COVID-19.Emergency radiology · 2021Article
- Spectrum of opportunistic fungal lung co-infections in COVID-19: What the radiologist needs to know.RadiologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessment of visual-coronary artery calcification on non-cardiac gated CT in COVID-19 patients could provide an objective approach to rapidly identify and triage clinically severe patients for early hospital admission to avert worse prognosis. PURPOSE: To ascertain the role of semi-quantitative scoring in visual-coronary artery calcification score (V-CACS) for predicting the clinical severity and outcome in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND
methodsWith institutional review board approval this study included 67 COVID-19 confirmed patients who underwent non-cardiac gated CT chest in an inpatient setting. Two blinded radiologist (Radiologist-1 &2) assessed the V-CACS, CT Chest severity score (CT-SS). The clinical data including the requirement for oxygen support, assisted ventilation, ICU admission and outcome was assessed, and patients were clinically subdivided depending on clinical severity. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. ROC curves analysis is performed for the assessment of performance and Pearson correlation were performed to looks for the associations.
resultsV-CACS cut off value of 3 (82.67% sensitivity and 54.55% specificity; AUC 0.75) and CT-SS with a cut off value of 21.5 (95.7% sensitivity and 63.6% specificity; AUC 0.87) are independent predictors for clinical severity and also the need for ICU admission or assisted ventilation. The pooling of both CT-SS and V-CACS (82.67% sensitivity and 86.4% specificity; AUC 0.92) are more reliable in terms of predicting the primary outcome of COVID-19 patients. On regression analysis, V-CACS and CT-SS are individual independent predictors of clinical severity in COVID-19 (Odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.99-2.98; p = 0.05 and Odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; p = 0.001 respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) for pooled V-CACS and CT-SS was 0.96 (95% CI 0.84-0.98) which correctly predicted 82.1% cases.
conclusionLogistic regression model using pooled Visual-Coronary artery calcification score and CT Chest severity score in non-cardiac gated CT can predict clinical severity and outcome in patients with COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.