Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484628›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Digital therapeutics for essential hypertension using a smartphone application: A randomized, open-label, multicenter pilot study.

Kazuomi Kario, Akihiro Nomura, Ayaka Kato, Noriko Harada, Tomoyuki Tanigawa, Ryuhei So, Shin Suzuki, Eisuke Hida, Kohta Satake

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Digital therapeutics in hypertension: How to make sustainable lifestyle changes.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024
    Review
  17. Digital hypertension towards to the anticipation medicine.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuomi KarioDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-4480
Akihiro NomuraCureApp Institute, Karuizawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6647-8240
Ayaka KatoCureApp Institute, Karuizawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6306-6600
Noriko HaradaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Tomoyuki TanigawaCureApp Institute, Karuizawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-3519
Ryuhei SoCureApp Institute, Karuizawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-350X
Shin SuzukiCureApp, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-9619
Eisuke HidaDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9381-2013
Kohta SatakeCureApp Institute, Karuizawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1035-4481
Jichi Medical University · JPJapanese Red Cross Medical Center · JPKanazawa University · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is the most considerable but treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Although physicians prescribe multiple antihypertensive drugs and promote lifestyle modifications, the real-world blood pressure (BP) control rate remains poor. To improve BP target achievement, we developed a novel digital therapeutic-the HERB software system -to manage hypertension. Here, we performed a randomized pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the HERB system for hypertension. We recruited 146 patients with essential hypertension from March 2018 to March 2019. We allocated eligible patients to the intervention group (HERB system + standard lifestyle modification) or control group (standard lifestyle modification alone). The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The baseline characteristics in each group were well balanced; the mean age was approx. 57 years, and 67% were male. In the primary end point at 24 weeks, HERB intervention did not lower the mean change of 24-hour SBP by ABPM compared with the controls (adjusted difference: -0.66 mmHg; p = .78). In an exploratory analysis focusing on antihypertensive drug-naïve patients aged <65, the effects of the HERB intervention were significantly greater than the control for reducing 24-hour SBP by ABPM at 16 weeks (adjusted difference: -7.6 mmHg; p = .013; and morning home SBP at 24 weeks (adjusted difference - 6.0 mmHg; p = .012). Thus, the HERB intervention did not achieve a primary efficacy end point. However, we observed that antihypertensive drug-naïve adult hypertensive patients aged <65 years could be a potential HERB system-effective target for further investigations of the efficacy of the system.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionMobile ApplicationsAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureEssential HypertensionHumansMalePilot ProjectsSmartphoneAntihypertensive Agentsambulatory blood pressure monitoringdigital therapeutichome blood pressure monitoringhypertensionlifestyle modificationmobile application

Identifiers

PMID33484628
PMCPMC8678748
OpenAlexW3123045031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.