ArticleClinical drug investigation2021
The CITIMERIVA Study: CITIcoline plus MEmantina plus RIVAstigmine in Older Patients Affected with Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is Citicoline Effective in Preventing and Slowing Down Dementia?-A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Pre- and Post-treatment Impact of Antioxidants on Astrocytic Reactive Oxygen SpeciesAn Undergraduate Classroom Research Project.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Biomolecular Aspects of Reelin in Neurodegenerative Disorders: An Old Candidate for a New Linkage of the Gut-Brain-Eye Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review, 2022 update.Revista de neurologia · 2022Review
- Effects of choline containing phospholipids on the neurovascular unit: A review.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCombined therapy of memantine or acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, with cholinergic precursors such as citicoline, can be effective in Alzheimer's disease. Indeed, they are able to increase the intrasynaptic levels of acetylcholine more than the single drug. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral citicoline plus memantine plus rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
methodsThis was a multi-centric, retrospective case-control study conducted in Italian Centers for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia on consecutive patients aged 65 years or older affected with Alzheimer's disease. Overall, 104 patients were recruited (27% male, mean age 76.04 ± 4.92 years); 41 (39.42%) treated with citicolin 1000 mg/day given orally + memantine + rivastigmine (Cases) and 63 (60.58%) treated with memantine + rivastigmine (Controls). At baseline (T0), month 6 (T1) and month 12 (T2), cognitive functions were assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), functional dependence by basal Activities (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), comorbidity by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), mood by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and behavioural disturbances by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Adverse events were reported during the study.
resultsThe difference in MMSE score was not significant when comparing the two groups at T0, T1 or T2. However, in the case group, the MMSE total score showed a statistically significant difference at T0 versus T1 (13.63 ± 2.46 vs. 14.17 ± 2.24; p = 0.008), and at T0 versus T2 (13.63 ± 2.46 vs. 14.32 ± 2.53; p = 0.002). In the control group, no statistical differences were found at baseline (T0), T1 and T2. ADL, IADL, GDS and NPI total score did not improve during the study in either the case or the control group.
conclusionsIn our study we observed absence of a statistically significant difference between case and control groups for the MMSE total scores. However, in the case group in the MMSE total scores, there was a statistically significant increase between the baseline and the end of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.