ArticlePlanta2021
Microtubules exert early, partial, and variable control of cotton fiber diameter.
Article in Planta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pan-Genome Analysis of theGenes · 2026Article
- Systems-level proteomic models of cotton fiber development: a high-resolution data resource to analyze cell dynamics and trait engineering.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory networks controlling cotton fibre development.Plant molecular biology · 2026Review
- Differential cellulose distribution drives polarized growth of cotton fibers.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mapping the Phosphorylation Regulatory Network of Single-Celled Fibre Elongation Mediated by GhBIN2 in Cotton.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- A cell fractionation and quantitative proteomics pipeline to enable functional analyses of cotton fiber development.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Daily glycome and transcriptome profiling reveals polysaccharide structures and correlated glycosyltransferases critical for cotton fiber growth.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Genome resources for three modern cotton lines guide future breeding efforts.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Domestication over Speciation in Allopolyploid Cotton Species: A Stronger Transcriptomic Pull.Genes · 2023Article
- Probing stress-regulated ordering of the plant cortical microtubule array via a computational approach.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Microtubule Regulation in Plants: From Morphological Development to Stress Adaptation.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- The Gossypium herbaceum L. Wagad genome as a resource for understanding cotton domestication.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Cotton fiber as a model for understanding shifts in cell development under domestication.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- The Biology of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Efficient imaging and computer vision detection of two cell shapes in young cotton fibers.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionVariable cotton fiber diameter is set early in anisotropic elongation by cell-type-specific processes involving the temporal and spatial regulation of microtubules in the apical region. Cotton fibers are single cells that originate from the seed epidermis of Gossypium species. Then, they undergo extreme anisotropic elongation and limited diametric expansion. The details of cellular morphogenesis determine the quality traits that affect fiber uses and value, such as length, strength, and diameter. Lower and more consistent diameter would increase the competitiveness of cotton fiber with synthetic fiber, but we do not know how this trait is controlled. The complexity of the question is indicated by the existence of fibers in two major width classes in the major commercial species: broad and narrow fibers exist in commonly grown G. hirsutum, whereas G. barbadense produces only narrow fiber. To further understand how fiber diameter is controlled, we used ovule cultures, morphology measurements, and microtubule immunofluorescence to observe the effects of microtubule antagonists on fiber morphology, including shape and diameter within 80 µm of the apex. The treatments were applied at either one or two days post-anthesis during different stages of fiber morphogenesis. The results showed that inhibiting the presence and/or dynamic activity of microtubules caused larger diameter tips to form, with greater effects often observed with earlier treatment. The presence and geometry of a microtubule-depleted-zone below the apex were transiently correlated with the apical diameter of the narrow tip types. Similarly, the microtubule antagonists had somewhat different effects between tip types. Overall, the results demonstrate cell-type-specific mechanisms regulating fiber expansion within 80 µm of the apex, with variation in the impact of microtubules between tip types and over developmental time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.