Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484330›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.

Nidhi Sheth, Harish Swaminathan, Amanda J Gonzalez, Ken R Duffy, Catherine M Grgicak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nidhi ShethCenter for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, 08102, USA.
Harish SwaminathanBiomedical Forensic Sciences Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Amanda J GonzalezDepartment of Chemistry, Rutgers University, 315 Penn Street R306C, Camden, NJ, 08102, USA.
Ken R DuffyHamilton Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Catherine M GrgicakCenter for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, 08102, USA. c.grgicak@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-0577
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USBoston University · USNational University of Ireland, Maynooth · IE

Funding

National Institute of Justice NIJ2014-DN-BX-K026National Institute of Justice NIJ2018-DU-BX-K0185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current analysis of forensic DNA stains relies on the probabilistic interpretation of bulk-processed samples that represent mixed profiles consisting of an unknown number of potentially partial representations of each contributor. Single-cell methods, in contrast, offer a solution to the forensic DNA mixture problem by incorporating a step that separates cells before extraction. A forensically relevant single-cell pipeline relies on efficient direct-to-PCR extractions that are compatible with standard downstream forensic reagents. Here we demonstrate the feasibility of implementing single-cell pipelines into the forensic process by exploring four metrics of electropherogram (EPG) signal quality-i.e., allele detection rates, peak heights, peak height ratios, and peak height balance across low- to high-molecular-weight short tandem repeat (STR) markers-obtained with four direct-to-PCR extraction treatments and a common post-PCR laboratory procedure. Each treatment was used to extract DNA from 102 single buccal cells, whereupon the amplification reagents were immediately added to the tube and the DNA was amplified/injected using post-PCR conditions known to elicit a limit of detection (LoD) of one DNA molecule. The results show that most cells, regardless of extraction treatment, rendered EPGs with at least a 50% true positive allele detection rate and that allele drop-out was not cell independent. Statistical tests demonstrated that extraction treatments significantly impacted all metrics of EPG quality, where the Arcturus® PicoPure™ extraction method resulted in the lowest median allele drop-out rate, highest median average peak height, highest median average peak height ratio, and least negative median values of EPG sloping for GlobalFiler™ STR loci amplified at half volume. We, therefore, conclude the feasibility of implementing single-cell pipelines for casework purposes and demonstrate that inferential systems assuming cell independence will not be appropriate in the probabilistic interpretation of a collection of single-cell EPGs.

Indexed as

AllelesSingle-Cell AnalysisDNADNA FingerprintingElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansLimit of DetectionMicrosatellite RepeatsMouth MucosaPolymerase Chain ReactionDNADirect-to-PCRForensic DNAForensic DNA MixturesHuman identificationSingle-cell forensic DNA

Identifiers

PMID33484330
OpenAlexW3125588546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.