Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484313›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature.

M F Lodde, M J Raschke, J Stolberg-Stolberg, J Everding, S Rosslenbroich, J C Katthagen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress on medial support augmentation techniques for proximal humeral fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. [Biphasic plate-Controlled instability in fracture healing].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. [Sensor-based monitoring of fracture healing].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M F LoddeDepartment for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. moritz.lodde@ukmuenster.de.
M J RaschkeDepartment for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
J Stolberg-StolbergDepartment for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
J EverdingDepartment for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
S RosslenbroichDepartment for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
J C KatthagenDepartment for Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert- Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal treatment strategy for the surgical management of femur fractures and non-unions remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess union rates, complications and outcome after femoral double plating. Treatment of shaft, distal, periprosthetic fractures and pathological proximal femur fractures as well as femoral non-unions with double plating were evaluated.

methodsA systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was conducted. Published literature reporting on the treatment and clinical outcome of femoral fractures and non-unions with double plating was identified. In total, 24 studies with 436 cases of double plating, 64 cases of single plating, 84 cases of intramedullary nailing (IM), and 1 interfragmentary screw treatment met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The evaluated literature was published between 1991 and 2020.

resultsDouble plating of femoral fractures achieved high healing rates and few complications were reported. It displayed significantly less intraoperative haemorrhage, shorter surgery time reduced risk of malunion in polytraumatised patients when compared to IM. Fracture healing rate of double-plating distal femoral fractures was 88.0%. However, there were no significant differences regarding fracture healing, complication or functional outcome when compared to single plating. Treatment of periprosthetic fractures with double plating displayed high healing rates (88.5%). Double plating of non-unions achieved excellent osseous union rates (98.5%).

conclusionsThe literature provides evidence for superior outcomes when using double plating in distal femoral fractures, periprosthetic fractures and femoral non-unions. Some evidence suggests that the use of double plating of femoral fractures in polytraumatised patients may be beneficial over other types of fracture fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFractures, SpontaneousPeriprosthetic FracturesBone PlatesFemurFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDouble platingFemoral fracturesNon-unionPeriprosthetic fracturePolytrauma

Identifiers

PMID33484313
PMCPMC9110521
OpenAlexW3123245250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.