Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484296›Full record

SynthesisGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Eye rubbing in the aetiology of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Srujana Sahebjada, Haitham H Al-Mahrouqi, Sophia Moshegov, Sathiya M Panchatcharam, Elsie Chan, Mark Daniell, Paul N Baird

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Update on the Physiopathology of Keratoconus.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Association between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and keratoconus.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Trends in the Management of Keratoconus in Australia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Srujana Sahebjada *Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia. Srujana.sahebjada@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-7209
Haitham H Al-MahrouqiAl-Nahdha Hospital, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
Sophia MoshegovDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Sathiya M PanchatcharamOman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman.
Elsie ChanDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Mark DaniellDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Paul N BairdDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUMinistry of Health · OMOman Medical College · OM

Funding

NHRMC APP1187763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKeratoconus is a potentially blinding condition that slowly deforms the cornea in young people. Despite the increasing prevalence of keratoconus, the exact aetiology of the condition is unknown. This first systematic review examines the evidence of eye rubbing and its association with keratoconus and presents the findings of the meta-analysis.

methodsTwo independent reviewers searched the electronic databases for all potential articles published from 1st of January 1900 to 31st of July 2020 on eye rubbing and keratoconus. The researchers assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The assessment for statistical heterogeneity was estimated using chi-square and I-square (I

resultsEight case-control studies were included in this systematic review. Two studies assessed eye rubbing without odds ratios and thus were excluded. The pooled odds ratios for the six remaining studies included in the meta-analysis was 6.46 (95% CI 4.12-10.1). The study results were heterogenous (I

conclusionEye rubbing showed consistent association with keratoconus. However, the current evidence is limited to only a small number of case-control studies which present as heterogeneous and of sub-optimal methodological quality. Additionally, the cause-effect temporal relationship cannot be determined. Further studies are needed to address this intricate relationship of eye rubbing and its induction, ongoing progression, and severity of keratoconus.

Indexed as

KeratoconusAdolescentCase-Control StudiesCorneaHumansOdds RatioPrevalenceAetiologyEye rubbingKeratoconusMeta-analysisReviewRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID33484296
OpenAlexW3122925624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.