ReviewJournal of AOAC International2021
Confirming the Presence of Legionella pneumophila in Your Water System: A Review of Current Legionella Testing Methods.
Review in Journal of AOAC International, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Environmental Investigations of Travel-Associated Legionnaires' Disease Cases: Timeliness, Microbiological Findings, and Public Health Response.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Detection of L. pneumophila non-serogroup 1 in hospital-acquired pneumonia: A cross-sectional study from Eastern India.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Microbial Diversity in Vehicle Windshield Washer Reservoirs: Findings fromMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- A Rapid and Sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a for the Detection ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- PCR-BasedMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Pediatric Populations of Slum Areas: Navigating Challenges and Dynamics of Immune Responses.Current pediatric reviews · 2025Review
- Biosensing Technologies for DetectingMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- The Contribution ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Comparison of pre-labelled primers and nucleotides as DNA labelling method for lateral flow detection of Legionella pneumophila amplicons.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sensitivity of Legionella pneumophila to phthalates and their substitutes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Development of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe for the Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a Most Probable Number Method for Detection and Quantification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Managing dental unit waterlines: a quality improvement programme.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Combining Traditional and Molecular Techniques Supports the Discovery of a NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- A Combined Immunofluorescence and Fluorescent Viability Cocktail Staining Procedure for Rapid Microscopic Detection and Enumeration of Live Legionella pneumophila.Journal of fluorescence · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legionnaires' disease has been recognized since 1976 and Legionella pneumophila still accounts for more than 95% of cases. Approaches in countries, including France, suggest that focusing risk reduction specifically on L. pneumophila is an effective strategy, as detecting L. pneumophila has advantages over targeting multiple species of Legionella. In terms of assays, the historically accepted plate culture method takes 10 days for confirmed Legionella spp. results, has variabilities which affect trending and comparisons, requires highly trained personnel to identify colonies on a plate in specialist laboratories, and does not recover viable-but-non-culturable bacteria. PCR is sensitive, specific, provides results in less than 24 h, and determines the presence/absence of Legionella spp. and/or L. pneumophila DNA. Whilst specialist personnel and laboratories are generally required, there are now on-site PCR options, but there is no agreement on comparing genome units to colony forming units and action limits. Immunomagnetic separation assays are culture-independent, detect multiple Legionella species, and results are available in 24 h, with automated processing options. Field-use lateral flow devices provide presence/absence determination of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 where sufficient cells are present, but testing potable waters is problematic. Liquid culture most probable number (MPN) assays provide confirmed L. pneumophila results in 7 days that are equivalent to or exceed plate culture, are robust and reproducible, and can be performed in a variety of laboratory settings. MPN isolates can be obtained for epidemiological investigations. This accessible, non-technical review will be of particular interest to building owners, operators, risk managers, and water safety groups and will enable them to make informed decisions to reduce the risk of L. pneumophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.