Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484128›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

A bottom-up approach to creating an ontology for medication indications.

Stuart J Nelson, Allen Flynn, Mark S Tuttle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stuart J NelsonDepartment of Clinical Leadership and Research, Biomedical Informatics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Allen FlynnDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mark S TuttleApelon, Orinda, California, USA.

Funding

Feasibility of a Therapeutic Intent OntologyR21LM012929 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI NELSON, STUART JAMES · 2018 to 2019
$386k
NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study sought to learn if it were possible to develop an ontology that would allow the Food and Drug Administration approved indications to be expressed in a manner computable and comparable to what is expressed in an electronic health record. MATERIALS AND

methodsA random sample of 1177 of the 3000+ extant, distinct medical products (identified by unique new drug application numbers) was selected for investigation. Close manual examination of the indication portion of the labels for these drugs led to the development of a formal model of indications.

resultsThe model represents each narrative indication as a disjunct of conjuncts of assertions about an individual. A desirable attribute is that each assertion about an individual should be testable without reference to other contextual information about the situation. The logical primitives are chosen from 2 categories (context and conditions) and are linked to an enumeration of uses, such as prevention. We found that more than 99% of approved label indications for treatment or prevention could be so represented. DISCUSSION: While some indications are straightforward to represent, difficulties stem from the need to represent temporal or sequential references. In addition, there is a mismatch of terminologies between what is present in an electronic health record and in the label narrative.

conclusionsA workable model for formalizing drug indications is possible. Remaining challenges include designing workflow to model narrative label indications for all approved drug products and incorporation of standard vocabularies.

Indexed as

Drug LabelingVocabulary, ControlledElectronic Health RecordsHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationdrug information servicesinformation managementinformation storage and retrievalmedication indications

Identifiers

PMID33484128
PMCPMC7973454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.