Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484100›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Real world outcomes of combination and timing of immunotherapy with radiotherapy for melanoma with brain metastases.

Justin T Moyers, Esther G Chong, Jiahao Peng, Hsin Hsiang Clarence Tsai, Daniel Sufficool, David Shavlik, Gayathri Nagaraj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin T MoyersDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-1652
Esther G ChongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-9521
Jiahao PengSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-383X
Hsin Hsiang Clarence TsaiSchool of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7661-9462
Daniel SufficoolDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
David ShavlikSchool of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gayathri NagarajDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7586-6920
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmunotherapy (IT) and radiotherapy (RT) have improved overall survival in patients with melanoma with brain metastasis (MBM). We examined the real-world survival impact of IT and RT combination and timing strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom the facility-based National Cancer Database (NCDB) data set, 3008 cases of MBM were identified between 2011 and 2015. Six treatment cohorts were identified: stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) + IT, SRS alone, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) + IT, WBRT alone, IT alone, and none. Concurrent therapy was defined as IT given within 28 days before or after RT; nonconcurrent defined as IT administered within 28-90 days of RT. The co-primary outcomes were propensity score-adjusted overall survival by treatment regimen and overall survival by RT and IT timing.

resultsMedian overall survival (mOS) was performed for each treatment category; SRS +IT 15.77 m; (95%CI 12.13-21.29), SRS alone (9.33 m; 95%CI: 8.0-11.3), IT alone (7.29 m; 95%CI: 5.35-12.91), WBRT +IT (4.89 m; 95%CI: 3.65-5.92), No RT or IT (3.29 m; 95%CI: 2.96-3.75), and WBRT alone (3.12 m; 95%CI 2.79-3.52). By propensity score matching, mOS for SRS +IT (15.5 m; 95%CI: 11.5-20.2) was greater than SRS alone (10.1 m; 95%CI: 8.4-11.8) (p = 0.010), and median survival for WBRT +IT (4.6 m; 95%CI: 3.4-5.6) was greater than WBRT alone (2.9 m; 95%CI: 2.5-3.5) (p < 0.001). In the SRS +IT group, 24-month landmark survival was 47% (95%CI; 42-52) for concurrent versus 37% (95%CI; 30-44) for nonconcurrent (p = 0.40).

conclusionThose who received IT in addition to WBRT and SRS experienced longer survival compared to RT modalities alone, while those receiving concurrent SRS and IT trended toward improved survival versus nonconcurrent therapy.

Indexed as

AgedBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRadiosurgerySurvival RateTreatment OutcomeWhole-Body Irradiationbrain metastasisimmunotherapymelanomaNCDBstereotactic radiosurgerywhole brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33484100
PMCPMC7926022
OpenAlexW3122287483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.