Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33484079›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2021

Articulations of antimicrobial resistance in trade union financed journals for nurses in Scandinavia - A Foucauldian perspective.

Stinne Glasdam, Henrik Loodin, Jonas Wrigstad

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ERRATUM.Nursing inquiry · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stinne GlasdamDepartment of Health Sciences, Integrative Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-3054
Henrik LoodinDepartment of Service Management and Service Studies, Lund University, Helsingborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3869-8526
Jonas WrigstadSkåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4741-7957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial infections is a growing threat to humanity and a challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Healthcare professionals have an important role in preventing AMR and the spreading of infections. This article focuses on trade union financed journals for nurses in Scandinavia studying how the journals articulate AMR to its readership. A systematic literature search over an eleven-year period was conducted, using web-based national trade union financed journals, searching for 'bacteria' and 'resistance'. A thematic analysis, inspired by Foucault's concepts of power and governmentality, was made of 131 texts to understand, which kind of practices, strategies and policies the journals frame regarding AMR. The time period studied resulted in the recognition of four separate themes: the horror scenario, the 'dangerous' other, healthcare professionals as a source of resistance development and AMR as a field of research and producer of research qualifications. The study concludes that the journals tend: to present AMR in apocalyptic terms with more research and pharmaceutical industries needed for avoidance; to point out problems in other countries, populations, and sometimes nurses' working conditions, but primarily with other professionals' behaviour; and lastly, to present the nurse as a good fairy and disciplinator of doctors.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialDenmarkHumansLabor UnionsNorwayPeriodicals as TopicSwedenantimicrobial resistancearticulationsfoucaultnursestrade union journals

Identifiers

PMID33484079
PMCPMC8365678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.