Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483915›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Choledochal Cyst or Benign Biliary Dilation: Is Resection Always Necessary?

Camilla Gomes, Patrick Tivnan, David McAneny, Jennifer F Tseng, Jaroslaw Tkacz, Teviah E Sachs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla GomesDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Patrick TivnanDepartment of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
David McAnenyDepartment of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer F TsengDepartment of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jaroslaw TkaczDepartment of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Teviah E SachsDepartment of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. teviah.sachs@bmc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-3606
Boston University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholedochal cysts (CC) are often diagnosed during the first few decades of life, when, due to the risk of malignancy, resection is advised. With an increasing number of patients undergoing abdominal imaging, many older patients have recently been radiographically diagnosed with biliary duct enlargement that meets the criteria of choledochal cysts. The management in these patients is less well defined, but resection is often recommended as it is for younger patients. We sought to better understand the significance of these biliary duct anomalies in adults.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients 18 years and older at our institution, who were given a radiographic diagnosis of choledochal cyst during the interval 2006-2019. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, readmissions, and follow-up imaging were evaluated.

resultsWe identified 22 patients, of whom 40.9% (n = 9) underwent an operation. The remainder was observed. Median duct size was 15 mm (range 2-25 mm). There were no significant differences in demographics between the two cohorts. Of those who underwent resection, none had evidence of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma upon final pathology. However, 33.3% (n = 3) had subsequent readmissions for complications, including post-operative nausea and vomiting, cholangitis, and anastomotic stenoses that required stenting. In the observation group, there was no obvious growth of the cysts or development of worrisome features to suggest malignant degeneration (median follow-up = 68 months).

conclusionA radiographic diagnosis of choledochal cyst in older adults is likely a different entity than those diagnosed in childhood. Close surveillance of these biliary duct anomalies in older adults may be a better option than resection and reconstruction with the associated risks of long-term morbidity.

Indexed as

CholangitisCholedochal CystAgedDilatationHumansRetrospective StudiesVomitingBiliary dilationCholangiocarcinomaCholdochal cyst

Identifiers

PMID33483915
OpenAlexW3125957752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.