Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483914›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency After Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Systematic Review and Optimal Management Recommendations.

Jaclyn V Moore, Stephanie Tom, Charles R Scoggins, Prejesh Philips, Michael E Egger, Robert C G Martin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.EClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaclyn V MooreNorton Cancer Institute, Louisville, USA.
Stephanie TomDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 315 E. Broadway #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Charles R ScogginsDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 315 E. Broadway #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Prejesh PhilipsDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 315 E. Broadway #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Michael E EggerDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 315 E. Broadway #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Robert C G MartinDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 315 E. Broadway #311, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. Robert.Martin@louisville.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5537-3387
University of Louisville · USNorton Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) occurs when pancreatic enzyme activity in the intestinal lumen is insufficient for normal digestion to occur. The true incidence and diagnosis of EPI after pancreatectomy has not been fully understood and optimized. The aim of this study was to present incidence and diagnostic criteria for EPI after pancreatectomy for cancer and provide a guide for management and optimal therapy in pancreatectomy patients with cancer.

methodsA comprehensive review of the literature with publication dates from 2014 to 2019 was performed. A comprehensive diagnostic and treatment algorithm was then created based on literature review and current treatment options.

resultsIn total, 30 studies were included, 19 combined both pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), 9 for central pancreatectomy, and 2 others. EPI was defined subjectively without definitive testing using any of the established diagnostic studies in the majority of studies 23 (76%). Preoperative EPI was calculated to be 11.52%. Most studies assessed exocrine function at least 6 months postoperatively with four studies extending the follow-up period beyond 12 months. EPI diagnosed postoperatively at 1 month (40.27%), 3 months (30.94%), 6 months (36.06%), and 12 months (34.69%). After PD, the median prevalence of postoperative EPI was 43.14%, CP, the median prevalence was 4.85%, DP, median prevalence of postoperative EPI of 11.94%.

conclusionEPI is a frequent outcome that is often misdiagnosed or under-reported by the patient post-pancreatectomy. Given the increasing overall survival in pancreatectomy patients for cancer, surgeon awareness and assessment is critical to improving patients' overall quality of life.

Indexed as

Exocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatectomyPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeMalabsorptionPancreatectomyPancreatic exocrine insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID33483914
OpenAlexW3124961014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.