Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483889›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2021

Economic Evaluation of First-Line Pertuzumab Therapy in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan.

Kensuke Moriwaki, Saki Uechi, Takaaki Fujiwara, Yu Hagino, Kojiro Shimozuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kensuke MoriwakiComprehensive Unit for Health Economic Evidence Review and Decision Support (CHEERS), Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, #209, Research Park Bid. No. 2, 134, Minami-machi, Chudoji, Simogyo-ku, Kyoto, 600-8813, Japan. moriken820318@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-597X
Saki UechiLaboratory of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, 4-19-1, Motoyamakita-machi, Higashinada-ku, Hyogo, 658-8558, Japan.
Takaaki FujiwaraLaboratory of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, 4-19-1, Motoyamakita-machi, Higashinada-ku, Hyogo, 658-8558, Japan.
Yu HaginoLaboratory of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, 4-19-1, Motoyamakita-machi, Higashinada-ku, Hyogo, 658-8558, Japan.
Kojiro ShimozumaComprehensive Unit for Health Economic Evidence Review and Decision Support (CHEERS), Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, #209, Research Park Bid. No. 2, 134, Minami-machi, Chudoji, Simogyo-ku, Kyoto, 600-8813, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H04099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel (PTD) for the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer in Japan.

methodsA partitioned survival analysis model was developed to predict costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in a PTD arm and a trastuzumab plus docetaxel (TD) arm. Direct medical costs were considered from the perspective of the Japanese healthcare system. The time horizon of the model was set to 20 years. Data on overall survival and progression-free survival were derived from the CLEOPATRA trial. Cost parameters were estimated using a real-world claims database. Utilities were derived from published sources outside Japan. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PTD therapy compared with TD therapy was estimated. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the uncertainty in parameter settings.

resultsCompared with TD therapy, PTD therapy incurred an additional cost of $US174,479 and conferred an additional 0.949 QALYs. This resulted in an ICER of $US183,901 per QALY gained. Utility weights for progression-free survival and progressed disease had a relatively large impact on the base-case result, but the ICERs remained higher than $US75,000 per QALY over the full range of model parameters. Based on a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability that PTD is cost effective was estimated to be 3.3%.

conclusionsApplying a willingness-to-pay threshold of $US75,000 per QALY, PTD therapy as first-line therapy would not be cost effective. Further research is required on utilities and clinical benefits for Japanese patients with breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID33483889
PMCPMC8333148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.