ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Safety of liver biopsy at the time of bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concomitant Liver Biopsy During Bariatric Surgery: No Increase in Major Complications or Readmissions but Associated with Higher Transfusion Requirements - An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Modernizing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnostics: the progressive shift from liver biopsy to noninvasive techniques.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of patients undergoing bariatric surgery have hepatic steatosis. Liver biopsy is not technically difficult to perform at the time of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), but there may be concerns for bleeding complications. The safety of liver biopsy (LBx) at the time of MBS has been studied in single institutional studies but has not been studied on a national level.
methodsThe MBSAQIP database for 2015-2018 was examined. The codes for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) of 43644 and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) 43775 were used along with 47000 (percutaneous liver biopsy), 47001 (percutaneous liver biopsy at time of other procedure), and 47379 (unlisted laparoscopic procedure, liver). Outcomes such as operative time, complications, and length of stay were examined. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to evaluate for adjusted associations.
resultsThere were 546,532 patients that met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 21,367 (3.9%) underwent LBx. Only 5.5% (8012) of patients undergoing RYGB had a LBx and 3.3% (13,355) of SG patients. Patients who underwent a LBx had a longer operative time before (103 min vs 84 min, p < 0.001) and after propensity matching [regression coefficient (RC): 10.7 (8.87, 12.5)]. There was no increase in length of stay. There was an increased risk in mortality in the unadjusted analysis (prevalence ratio = 1.61, p = 0.02), but when propensity-matched analysis was done, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Concerning bleeding or transfusion, there was no difference in bleeding or rates of transfusion (p= 0.22, p = 0.21).
conclusionLiver biopsy at the time of MBS is safe. It adds operative time, but there is no increase in length of stay, bleeding complications, morbidity, or death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33483847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.