ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021
Anatomical variations of clivus: a descriptive anatomical study.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The developing spheno-occipital skull base: developmental variants and embryologic remnants that mimic pathology in children.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Anatomical and morphometric study of variations of the clivus in dried human skulls from the northeastern Thai population.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Investigation of the prevalence and main features of skull-base anomalies and characteristics of the sphenoid sinus using cone-beam computed tomography.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022Article
- The craniovertebral junction, between osseous variants and abnormalities: insight from a paleo-osteological study.Anatomical science international · 2022Review
- Radiologic evaluation of the fossa navicularis: incidence, morphometric features, and clinical implications.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe clivus is a part of the sphenoid bone. It may show some anatomical variations such as fossa navicularis magna (FNM), canalis basilaris medianus (CBM) and craniopharyngeal canal (CPC). These variations have been associated with conditions like meningitis and tumors of skull base. Inadequate information about these structures may pose a risk of inaccurate diagnosis resulting in unwarranted interventional procedures. Hence, the knowledge about the prevalence of these variations is important. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of fossa navicularis magna, craniopharyngeal canal and canalis basilaris medianus and its types utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
methodsRetrospectively, a total of 350 CBCT scans were evaluated for the presence of FNM, CBM, its types and CPC. The analysis was done by two observers independently. Cohen's kappa statistics was used to determine the interobserver agreement.
resultsFNM was noted in 19.4% cases, CBM in 9.7% cases, whereas CPC was not identified in any case. Type 5 was the most common type of CBM. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between genders and age groups for the prevalence and a highly significant (p < 0.01) substantial agreement between observers for the prevalence of FNM and highly significant (p < 0.01) moderate agreement for the prevalence of CBM and its types was obtained.
conclusionFNM, CBM, CPC, albeit rare anatomical variations of clivus, knowledge of these structures is important for radiologists, anatomists and surgeons to avoid misdiagnosis and provide awareness to the individual of a higher possibility of meningitis or tumors of the skull base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.