Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483772›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2021

Subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears: diagnostic performance and reliability of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) with arthroscopic correlation and comparison with clinical tests.

Eun Kyung Khil, Jung-Ah Choi, Eugene Lee, Joo Han Oh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Comparison of the Clinical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Development of a risk stratification model for subscapularis tendon tear based on patient-specific data from 528 shoulder arthroscopy].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Kyung KhilDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Hospital, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 18450, South Korea.
Jung-Ah ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Hospital, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 18450, South Korea. jachoi88@gmail.com.
Eugene LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumiro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, South Korea.
Joo Han OhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumiro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, South Korea.
Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and reliability of magnetic resonance of arthrography (MRA) in diagnosis of subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears between two reviewers with varying levels of experience, and compare the results with clinical tests. MATERIALS AND

methodsSSC tendons were retrospectively evaluated in a total of 272 patients with arthroscopic confirmations. A total of 548 shoulder MRAs were evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists, and SSC tendon pathologies were classified into three groups: intact tendon (n = 149), partial-thickness tear (n = 92), or full-thickness tear (n = 31). Diagnostic performance was determined using arthroscopy as gold standard and compared with results of four clinical tests. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of two reviewers were evaluated using kappa statistics.

resultsFor full-thickness tears, mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of reviewer 1/reviewer 2 were 71.0%/87.1%, 97.3%/98.3%, and 94.4%/95.5%, respectively. For partial-thickness tears, mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 72.8%/73.4%, 78.3%/81.2%, and 76.5%/78.5%, respectively. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities for both reviewers were good to very good (k = 0.85/0.93, p < 0.001; k = 0.74-0.89, p < 0.001). For all clinical tests, while specificity was very high, sensitivity was very low and the overall accuracy was also low.

conclusionMRA showed high diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of SSC tendon tears, especially full-thickness tears, with good inter- and intra-observer reliabilities, regardless of the level of experience of the reviewer.

Indexed as

Rotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesArthrographyArthroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTendonsMR-imagingMuscularShoulderSkeletal-appendicularTendons

Identifiers

PMID33483772
OpenAlexW3124872496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.