ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
Subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears: diagnostic performance and reliability of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) with arthroscopic correlation and comparison with clinical tests.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for rotator cuff tears : Comparison with magnetic resonance arthrography as the gold standard.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Comparison of the Clinical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative].Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2025Article
- Correlation between clinical, ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings of subscapularis tears: A prospective study.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- SUBSCAPULAR INJURY: PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, MRI AND ARTHROSCOPY.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2025Article
- SSR white paper: guidelines for utilization and performance of direct MR arthrography.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Subscapularis tendon tear classification and diagnosis: A systemic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Quantitative MRI indicators and features for partial subscapularis tendon tears on conventional shoulder MRI.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- [Development of a risk stratification model for subscapularis tendon tear based on patient-specific data from 528 shoulder arthroscopy].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and reliability of magnetic resonance of arthrography (MRA) in diagnosis of subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears between two reviewers with varying levels of experience, and compare the results with clinical tests. MATERIALS AND
methodsSSC tendons were retrospectively evaluated in a total of 272 patients with arthroscopic confirmations. A total of 548 shoulder MRAs were evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists, and SSC tendon pathologies were classified into three groups: intact tendon (n = 149), partial-thickness tear (n = 92), or full-thickness tear (n = 31). Diagnostic performance was determined using arthroscopy as gold standard and compared with results of four clinical tests. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of two reviewers were evaluated using kappa statistics.
resultsFor full-thickness tears, mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of reviewer 1/reviewer 2 were 71.0%/87.1%, 97.3%/98.3%, and 94.4%/95.5%, respectively. For partial-thickness tears, mean values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 72.8%/73.4%, 78.3%/81.2%, and 76.5%/78.5%, respectively. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities for both reviewers were good to very good (k = 0.85/0.93, p < 0.001; k = 0.74-0.89, p < 0.001). For all clinical tests, while specificity was very high, sensitivity was very low and the overall accuracy was also low.
conclusionMRA showed high diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of SSC tendon tears, especially full-thickness tears, with good inter- and intra-observer reliabilities, regardless of the level of experience of the reviewer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.