Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483762›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2021

Deficiency of the innate immune adaptor STING promotes autoreactive T cell expansion in NOD mice.

Satoru Akazawa, Leanne Mackin, Gaurang Jhala, Stacey Fynch, Tara Catterall, Claudia Selck, Kate L Graham, Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy, Evan G Pappas, Chun-Ting J Kwong and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Applications of Genome-Editing Technologies for Type 1 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoru AkazawaSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Leanne MackinSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Gaurang JhalaSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Stacey FynchSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Tara CatterallSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Claudia SelckSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Kate L GrahamSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Balasubramanian KrishnamurthySt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Evan G PappasSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Chun-Ting J KwongSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Andrew P R SutherlandSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Thomas W H KaySt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Thomas C BrodnickiSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Helen E ThomasSt Vincent's Institute, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia. hthomas@svi.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6604-6640
The University of Melbourne · AUSt Vincents Institute of Medical Research · AUNagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisStimulator of IFN genes (STING) is a central hub for cytosolic nucleic acid sensing and its activation results in upregulation of type I IFN production in innate immune cells. A type I IFN gene signature seen before the onset of type 1 diabetes has been suggested as a driver of disease initiation both in humans and in the NOD mouse model. A possible source of type I IFN is through activation of the STING pathway. Recent studies suggest that STING also has antiproliferative and proapoptotic functions in T cells that are independent of IFN. To investigate whether STING is involved in autoimmune diabetes, we examined the impact of genetic deletion of STING in NOD mice.

methodsCRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to generate STING-deficient NOD mice. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to assess the level of type I IFN-regulated genes in islets from wild-type and STING-deficient NOD mice. The number of islet-specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP)

resultsSTING deficiency partially attenuated the type I IFN gene signature in islets but did not suppress insulitis. STING-deficient NOD mice accumulated an increased number of IGRP CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationData suggest that sensing of endogenous nucleic acids through the STING pathway may be partially responsible for the type I IFN gene signature but not autoimmunity in NOD mice. Our results show that the STING pathway may play an unexpected intrinsic role in suppressing the number of diabetogenic T cells.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationLymphocyte ActivationAdoptive TransferAnimalsAutoimmunityCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Disease Models, AnimalFemaleGene Expression RegulationIslets of LangerhansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, KnockoutMembrane ProteinsSting1 protein, mouseSTING ProteinCD8+ T cellsNOD miceSTINGType 1 diabetesType 1 interferon

Identifiers

PMID33483762
OpenAlexW3123891942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.