Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483660›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2021

Dental tourists: treat, re-treat or do not treat?

Shoukat Ashiti, Catherine Moshkun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rolling up our sleeves.British dental journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shoukat AshitiPostgraduate OMFS student, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, M15 6FD, UK. drshoukat@hotmail.com.
Catherine MoshkunSpeciality Dentist, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, M15 6FD, UK.
University Dental Hospital of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many UK patients in the search for their perfect smile have now decided to have their dental treatment abroad, the main reasons being that they believe they can have the same treatment but at a much lower price. With many overseas clinics offering treatment packages that also include a holiday, dental tourism seems an opportunity not to be missed. Although not always the case, some treatments unfortunately do not go to plan, often leaving distraught patients and their apprehensive dentists in a difficult situation. This article will discuss the reasons behind dental tourism and if the health system has contributed to the increasing demand for dental tourism. We will touch on the impact dental tourism has had on UK dentistry and if the NHS should be responsible for handling the consequences of any failed or incomplete dental treatment carried out abroad. It will also put the spotlight on dentists' responsibilities and to what extent they should treat these patients, as these cases can leave clinicians in primary and secondary care in a challenging predicament, not only clinically but also ethically and medico-legally.

Indexed as

Medical TourismDelivery of Health CareDentistsHumans

Identifiers

PMID33483660
OpenAlexW3124878282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.