Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483603›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2022

Combination therapy with topical alprostadil and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors after failure of oral therapy in patients with erectile dysfunction: a prospective, two-arm, open-label, non-randomized study.

Pablo Garrido-Abad, Isabel Senra-Bravo, Celeste Manfredi, Esaú Fernández-Pascual, Estefanía Linares-Espinós, Manuel Fernández-Arjona, David Varillas-Delgado, Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca

Abstract readClinical Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Voice Assistants as Consultants for Male Patients with Sexual Dysfunction: A Reliable Option?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo Garrido-AbadUrology Department, Hospital Universitario del Henares, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Coslada, Madrid, Spain. pgabad@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2734-9387
Isabel Senra-BravoUrology Department, Hospital Universitario del Henares, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Celeste ManfrediDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-8516
Esaú Fernández-PascualLyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-2617
Estefanía Linares-EspinósLyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Fernández-ArjonaUrology Department, Hospital Universitario del Henares, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
David Varillas-DelgadoUnidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Ignacio Martínez-SalamancaLyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are the first-line therapeutic option for erectile dysfunction (ED), while second-line therapy includes the alprostadil. Due to the different pharmacodynamic mechanism of PDE5Is and alprostadil, a synergistic action is conceivable when they are administered in combination. The aim of present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with PDE5I and topical alprostadil in patients with ED non-responders to PDE5I alone. We designed a prospective, two-arm, open-label, non-randomized study. Patients over 18 years old, with a stable sexual relationship for at least 6 months, and ED non-responders to PDE5I monotherapy were included in the study. At baseline the variables assessed were 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), and Sexual Encounter Profile Questions 2 and 3 (SEP-2 and SEP-3). In addition, all subjects underwent penile dynamic duplex ultrasonography. All patients were assigned to the monotherapy group (Group A) or combination therapy group (Group B) based on their preference. Topical alprostadil 300 μg/100 mg (Virirec®) was the treatment assigned to Group A, while the combination therapy with the last PDE5I taken (at the maximum recommended dose) plus topical alprostadil 300 μg/100 mg (Virirec®) was assigned to Group B. After 3 months from assignment to groups were evaluated IIEF-5, SEP-2 and SEP-3 regarding the last sexual intercourse, and Global Assessment Questionnaire-Questions 1 and 2 (GAQ-1 and GAQ-2). All adverse events (AEs) that occurred during the study period were recorded. A total of 170 patients were included in the study (72 in Group A and 98 in Group B). Fifty-two patients were previously treated with sildenafil 100 mg (30.6%), 6 with vardenafil 20 mg (3.5%), 56 with tadalafil 20 mg (32.9%), and 56 with avanafil 200 mg (32.9%). No significant differences among the study groups were found at baseline (p > 0.05). The mean IIEF-5 score increased significantly in Group B after treatment compared to baseline (12.4 ± 3.4 vs. 17.1 ± 4.5; p < 0.001), conversely patients in Group A showed no significant increase (12.2 ± 2.5 vs. 12.7 ± 3.1; p = 0.148). The number of affirmative responses to SEP-2 was significantly higher after treatment compared to baseline only in Group B (57 vs. 78; p < 0.001). The number of affirmative responses to SEP-3 was significantly higher after treatment compared to baseline in both groups (p < 0.001). The number of affirmative responses to GAQ-Q1 and GAQ-Q2 was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (p < 0.001). A total of 59 (34.7%) patients experienced AEs. They were mild, self-limited, and did not cause discontinuation of treatment. No episode of priapism was recorded. No statistically significant difference was recorded between the AEs of the two groups, except for facial flushing that was reported only in Group B (p = 0.021). The combination therapy with topical alprostadil and PDE5I seems to be more effective than topical alprostadil alone without worsening the safety of the treatment.

Indexed as

AlprostadilErectile DysfunctionPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsAdministration, TopicalAdultDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMaleProspective StudiesTreatment FailureAlprostadilPhosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33483603
OpenAlexW3126047966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.