Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of subsistence farmers, their livestock, and the surrounding environment in rural Nepal.

Supram Hosuru Subramanya, Indira Bairy, Yang Metok, Bharat Prasad Baral, Dipendra Gautam, Niranjan Nayak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Antimicrobial resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phenotypic and genome-based characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. One Health, One Microbiome.Microbiome · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Supram Hosuru SubramanyaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. supram.gowda@gmail.com.
Indira BairyMelaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Yang MetokDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Bharat Prasad BaralDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Dipendra GautamDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Niranjan NayakDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Manipal College of Medical Sciences · NPManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing trend of gut colonization by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales has been observed in conventional farm animals and their owners. Still, such colonization among domesticated organically fed livestock has not been well studied. This study aimed to determine the gut colonization rate of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) among rural subsistence farming communities of the Kaski district in Nepal. Rectal swabs collected by systematic random sampling from 128 households of subsistence farming communities were screened for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and CPE by phenotypic and molecular methods. A total of 357 (57%) ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates were obtained from 626 specimens, which included 97 ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (75.8%) from 128 adult humans, 101 (79.5%) from 127 of their children, 51 (47.7%) from 107 cattle, 26 (51%) from 51 goats, 30 (34.9%) from 86 poultry and 52 (42%) from 127 environmental samples. No CPE was isolated from any of the samples. bla

Indexed as

FarmersLivestockRural PopulationAdultAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesChildDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeHumansIntestinesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNepalAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID33483551
PMCPMC7822894
OpenAlexW3122104172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.