Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

INSPECTOR: free software for magnetic resonance spectroscopy data inspection, processing, simulation and analysis.

Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Kelley M Swanberg, Christoph Juchem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Digital Phantom for MR Spectroscopy Data Simulation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Model-based frequency-and-phase correction ofMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Model-based frequency-and-phase correction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In VitroMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin GajdošíkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA. mg4057@columbia.edu.
Karl LandheerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Kelley M SwanbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Christoph JuchemDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a powerful tool for biomedical research and clinical diagnostics, allowing for non-invasive measurement and analysis of small molecules from living tissues. However, currently available MRS processing and analytical software tools are limited in their potential for in-depth quality management, access to details of the processing stream, and user friendliness. Moreover, available MRS software focuses on selected aspects of MRS such as simulation, signal processing or analysis, necessitating the use of multiple packages and interfacing among them for biomedical applications. The freeware INSPECTOR comprises enhanced MRS data processing, simulation and analytical capabilities in a one-stop-shop solution for a wide range of biomedical research and diagnostic applications. Extensive data handling, quality management and visualization options are built in, enabling the assessment of every step of the processing chain with maximum transparency. The parameters of the processing can be flexibly chosen and tailored for the specific research problem, and extended confidence information is provided with the analysis. The INSPECTOR software stands out in its user-friendly workflow and potential for automation. In addition to convenience, the functionalities of INSPECTOR ensure rigorous and consistent data processing throughout multi-experiment and multi-center studies.

Identifiers

PMID33483543
PMCPMC7822873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.