Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Identifying the true number of specimens of the extinct blue antelope (Hippotragus leucophaeus).

Elisabeth Hempel, Faysal Bibi, J Tyler Faith, James S Brink, Daniela C Kalthoff, Pepijn Kamminga, Johanna L A Paijmans, Michael V Westbury, Michael Hofreiter, Frank E Zachos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Elisabeth HempelEvolutionary Adaptive Genomics, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. Hempel.Elisabeth@posteo.org.
Faysal BibiMuseum Für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
J Tyler FaithNatural History Museum of Utah, University of Utah, 301 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
James S BrinkFlorisbad Quaternary Research Station and Department, National Museum Bloemfontein, P.O. Box 266, Bloemfontein, 9031, Republic of South Africa.
Daniela C KalthoffSwedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pepijn KammingaNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johanna L A PaijmansEvolutionary Adaptive Genomics, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Michael V WestburySection for Evolutionary Genomics, The GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael HofreiterEvolutionary Adaptive Genomics, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Frank E ZachosNatural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
University of Potsdam · DEMuseum für Naturkunde · DENational Museum · ZANaturalis Biodiversity Center · NLSwedish Museum of Natural History · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of the Free State · ZAUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HO 3492/3-1 BI 1879/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native to southern Africa, the blue antelope (Hippotragus leucophaeus) is the only large African mammal species known to have become extinct in historical times. However, it was poorly documented prior to its extinction ~ 1800 AD, and many of the small number of museum specimens attributed to it are taxonomically contentious. This places limitations on our understanding of its morphology, ecology, and the mechanisms responsible for its demise. We retrieved genetic information from ten of the sixteen putative blue antelope museum specimens using both shotgun sequencing and mitochondrial genome target capture in an attempt to resolve the uncertainty surrounding the identification of these specimens. We found that only four of the ten investigated specimens, and not a single skull, represent the blue antelope. This indicates that the true number of historical museum specimens of the blue antelope is even smaller than previously thought, and therefore hardly any reference material is available for morphometric, comparative and genetic studies. Our study highlights how genetics can be used to identify rare species in natural history collections where other methods may fail or when records are scarce. Additionally, we present an improved mitochondrial reference genome for the blue antelope as well as one complete and two partial mitochondrial genomes. A first analysis of these mitochondrial genomes indicates low levels of maternal genetic diversity in the 'museum population', possibly confirming previous results that blue antelope population size was already low at the time of the European colonization of South Africa.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsAntelopesConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationGenome, MitochondrialMuseumsPhylogenyPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsSequence Analysis, DNASouth AfricaSpecies SpecificityDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID33483538
PMCPMC7822880
OpenAlexW3122797832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.