Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483436›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Automated detection of patients with dementia whose symptoms have been identified in primary care but have no formal diagnosis: a retrospective case-control study using electronic primary care records.

Elizabeth Ford, Joanne Sheppard, Seb Oliver, Philip Rooney, Sube Banerjee, Jackie A Cassell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence for dementia-Applied models and digital health.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for 15-year risk of Alzheimer dementia in primary care patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth FordDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK e.m.ford@bsms.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-8509
Joanne SheppardDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK.
Seb OliverDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK.
Philip RooneyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK.
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Jackie A CassellDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0777-0385
University of Sussex · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202133/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUK statistics suggest only two-thirds of patients with dementia get a diagnosis recorded in primary care. General practitioners (GPs) report barriers to formally diagnosing dementia, so some patients may be known by GPs to have dementia but may be missing a diagnosis in their patient record. We aimed to produce a method to identify these 'known but unlabelled' patients with dementia using data from primary care patient records.

designRetrospective case-control study using routinely collected primary care patient records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

settingUK general practice.

participantsEnglish patients aged >65 years, with a coded diagnosis of dementia recorded in 2000-2012 (cases), matched 1:1 with patients with no diagnosis code for dementia (controls).

interventionsEight coded and nine keyword concepts indicating symptoms, screening tests, referrals and care for dementia recorded in the 5 years before diagnosis. We trialled machine learning classifiers to discriminate between cases and controls (logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The outcome variable was dementia diagnosis code; the accuracy of classifiers was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); the order of features contributing to discrimination was examined.

results93 426 patients were included; the median age was 83 years (64.8% women). Three classifiers achieved high discrimination and performed very similarly. AUCs were 0.87-0.90 with coded variables, rising to 0.90-0.94 with keywords added. Feature prioritisation was different for each classifier; commonly prioritised features were Alzheimer's prescription, dementia annual review, memory loss and dementia keywords.

conclusionsIt is possible to detect patients with dementia who are known to GPs but unlabelled with a diagnostic code, with a high degree of accuracy in electronic primary care record data. Using keywords from clinic notes and letters improves accuracy compared with coded data alone. This approach could improve identification of dementia cases for record-keeping, service planning and delivery of good quality care.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesElectronicsFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective Studiesdelirium & cognitive disordersdementiageriatric medicinehealth informaticsold age psychiatryprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33483436
PMCPMC7831719
OpenAlexW3121797755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.