Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483431›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

The Neurophysiological Representation of Imagined Somatosensory Percepts in Human Cortex.

Luke Bashford, Isabelle Rosenthal, Spencer Kellis, Kelsie Pejsa, Daniel Kramer, Brian Lee, Charles Liu, Richard A Andersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke BashfordDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 bashford@caltech.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-2491
Isabelle RosenthalDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-9791-3820
Spencer KellisDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-5158-1058
Kelsie PejsaDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.
Daniel KramerDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.
Brian LeeDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-3592-8146
Charles LiuDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.
Richard A AndersenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-7947-0472
California Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Sensory Motor Transformations in Human CortexU01NS123127 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2021 to 2025
$4.6M
Dexterous BMIs for tetraplegic humans utilizing somatosensory cortex stimulationU01NS098975 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSEN, RICHARD A · 2016 to 2018
$2.4M
USC Neurosurgery Research Education Training ProgramR25NS099008 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MACK, WILLIAM J · 2017 to 2023
$516k
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS099008NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098975NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS123127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in human primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been used to successfully evoke naturalistic sensations. However, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the evoked sensations remain unknown. To understand how specific stimulation parameters elicit certain sensations we must first understand the representation of those sensations in the brain. In this study we record from intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in S1, premotor cortex, and posterior parietal cortex of a male human participant performing a somatosensory imagery task. The sensations imagined were those previously elicited by ICMS of S1, in the same array of the same participant. In both spike and local field potential recordings, features of the neural signal can be used to classify different imagined sensations. These features are shown to be stable over time. The sensorimotor cortices only encode the imagined sensation during the imagery task, while posterior parietal cortex encodes the sensations starting with cue presentation. These findings demonstrate that different aspects of the sensory experience can be individually decoded from intracortically recorded human neural signals across the cortical sensory network. Activity underlying these unique sensory representations may inform the stimulation parameters for precisely eliciting specific sensations via ICMS in future work.

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationElectrocorticographyHumansImaginationMaleMotor CortexNeurophysiologyParietal LobeSomatosensory CortexSpinal Cord Injuriesbrain-machine interfacehumanintracortical microstimulationsensationsomatosensation

Identifiers

PMID33483431
PMCPMC8018772
OpenAlexW3125410670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.