Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33483297›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2021

Repopulation of decellularised articular cartilage by laser-based matrix engraving.

S Nürnberger, C Schneider, C Keibl, B Schädl, P Heimel, X Monforte, A H Teuschl, M Nalbach, P J Thurner, J Grillari and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advanced therapies in orthopaedics.EFORT open reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Decellularization of Articular Cartilage: A Hydrochloric Acid-Based Strategy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Articular Cartilage Regeneration in Veterinary Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S NürnbergerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Division of Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: sylvia.nuernberger@meduniwien.ac.at.
C SchneiderLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
C KeiblLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria.
B SchädlLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria; University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
P HeimelLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria; University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
X MonforteDepartment Life Science Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria.
A H TeuschlAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria; Department Life Science Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria.
M NalbachInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
P J ThurnerInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
J GrillariLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria; Department of Biotechnology, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Austria.
H RedlLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
S WolbankLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Trauma Research Center, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA · ATTU Wien · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of advances in the treatment of cartilage defects using cell and scaffold-based therapeutic strategies, the long-term outcome is still not satisfying since clinical scores decline years after treatment. Scaffold materials currently used in clinical settings have shown limitations in providing suitable biomechanical properties and an authentic and protective environment for regenerative cells. To tackle this problem, we developed a scaffold material based on decellularised human articular cartilage.

methodsHuman articular cartilage matrix was engraved using a CO

findingsCrossed line engravings of the matrix allowed for a most regular and ubiquitous distribution of cells and chemical as well as enzymatic matrix treatment was performed to increase cell adhesion. The biomechanical characteristics of this novel scaffold that we term CartiScaff were found to be superior to those of commercially available materials. Neo-tissue was integrated excellently into the scaffold matrix and new collagen fibres were guided by the laser incisions towards a vertical alignment, a typical feature of native cartilage important for nutrition and biomechanics. In an ectopic, unloaded in vivo model, chondrocytes and mesenchymal stromal cells differentiated within the incisions despite the lack of growth factors and load, indicating a strong chondrogenic microenvironment within the scaffold incisions. Cells, most noticeably bone marrow-derived cells, were able to repopulate the empty chondrocyte lacunae inside the scaffold matrix.

interpretationDue to the better load-bearing, its chondrogenic effect and the ability to guide matrix-deposition, CartiScaff is a promising biomaterial to accelerate rehabilitation and to improve long term clinical success of cartilage defect treatment.

fundingAustrian Research Promotion Agency FFG ("CartiScaff" #842455), Lorenz Böhler Fonds (16/13), City of Vienna Competence Team Project Signaltissue (MA23, #18-08).

Indexed as

Lasers, GasTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCartilage, ArticularCattleCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationChondrogenesisExtracellular MatrixGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansImmunohistochemistryMechanical PhenomenaMesenchymal Stem CellsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCartilage regenerationDecellularisationEctopic animal modelLaser engravingMechanical testingRepopulation

Identifiers

PMID33483297
PMCPMC7910698
OpenAlexW3122333771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.