Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482988›Full record

ReviewMethods in enzymology2021

ER/K-link-Leveraging a native protein linker to probe dynamic cellular interactions.

Tejas M Gupte, Michael Ritt, Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in enzymology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tejas M GupteDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Michael RittDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Sivaraj SivaramakrishnanDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. Electronic address: sivaraj@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Emergent cellular functions of GPCRs and myosinsR35GM126940 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
Structural dynamics underlying GPCR-G protein selectivityR01GM117923 · NIGMS · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI VAIDEHI, NAGARAJAN · 2017 to 2024
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117923NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ER/K α-helices are a subset of single alpha helical domains, which exhibit unusual stability as isolated protein secondary structures. They adopt an elongated structural conformation, while regulating the frequency of interactions between proteins or polypeptides fused to their ends. Here we review recent advances on the structure, stability and function of ER/K α-helices as linkers (ER/K linkers) in native proteins. We describe methodological considerations in the molecular cloning, protein expression and measurement of interaction strengths, using sensors incorporating ER/K linkers. We highlight biological insights obtained over the last decade by leveraging distinct biophysical features of ER/K-linked sensors. We conclude with the outlook for the use of ER/K linkers in the selective modulation of dynamic cellular interactions.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteinsModels, MolecularProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Structure, SecondaryPeptidesProteinsER/K linkerFRET biosensorsGPCRKinasesProtein-protein interactionsSignalingSingle alpha helix

Identifiers

PMID33482988
PMCPMC8009693
OpenAlexW3100873932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.