Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482910›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2021

Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine-alcohol versus chlorhexidine-alcohol for surgical skin preparation on the aerobic and anaerobic skin flora of the shoulder region.

Dorothea Dörfel, Matthias Maiwald, Georg Daeschlein, Gerald Müller, Robert Hudek, Ojan Assadian, Günter Kampf, Thomas Kohlmann, Julian Camill Harnoss, Axel Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The shoulder microbiome: a systematic review and meta analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Dorothea Dörfel *Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Matthias Maiwald *Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5448-8417
Georg DaeschleinDepartment of Dermatology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Gerald MüllerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Robert HudekShoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rhön-Klinikum AG, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-3749
Ojan AssadianRegional Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0129-8761
Günter KampfInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas KohlmannInstitute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5956-8309
Julian Camill HarnossDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery and Study Center, German Surgical Society, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-0248
Axel KramerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. kramer@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-2149
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DENational University of Singapore · SGRhön-Klinikum · DEUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutibacterium acnes is part of the anaerobic skin microbiome and resides in deeper skin layers. The organism is an agent of surgical site infections (SSI) in shoulder surgery. We hypothesized that prolonged skin preparation with an agent that penetrates deeply into the skin would be beneficial. Thus, we compared two classes of antiseptics, each combined with alcohol, each applied with two different contact times.

methodsUsing a cross-over arrangement, shoulders of 16 healthy volunteers were treated for 2.5 min (standard) or 30 min (prolonged) with alcohol-based chlorhexidine (CHG-ALC) or alcohol-based povidone-iodine (PVP-I-ALC). Skin sites were sampled before, immediately after, and 3 h after treatment, using a standardized cup-scrub technique.

resultsAerobic skin flora was reduced more effectively by PVP-I-ALC than by CHG-ALC after 2.5 min application and immediate sampling (reduction factor [RF] 2.55 ± 0.75 vs. 1.94 ± 0.91, p = 0.04), but not after prolonged contact times and 3-h sampling. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were completely eliminated after PVP-I-ALC application, but still recovered from 4 of 32 samples after CHG-ALC application. Anaerobic flora was reduced more effectively by PVP-I-ALC than CHG-ALC after standard (RF 3.96 ± 1.46 vs. 1.74 ± 1.24, p < 0.01) and prolonged (RF 3.14 ± 1.20 vs. 1.38 ± 1.16, p < 0.01) contact times and immediate sampling, but not after 3-h sampling. No adverse events were reported.

conclusionsPVP-I-ALC showed marginal benefits concerning the aerobic flora, but more substantial benefits over CHG-ALC concerning the anaerobic flora of the shoulder. Standard and prolonged contact times showed superiority for PVP-I-ALC for anaerobic flora at all immediate sampling points, but missed significance at 3-h sampling. The results underscore the need for protection against C. acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci in orthopaedic surgery. The clinical relevance of these findings, however, should be studied with SSI as an endpoint.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovidone-IodinePreoperative CareShoulderSkinSurgical Wound InfectionYoung AdultAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinePovidone-IodineAlcoholChlorhexidinePovidone-iodineShoulder surgerySkin antisepsis

Identifiers

PMID33482910
PMCPMC7821636
OpenAlexW3121768342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.