Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482906›Full record

SynthesisAddiction science & clinical practice2021

The impact of project ECHO on physician preparedness to treat opioid use disorder: a systematic review.

Hunter M Puckett, Jenny S Bossaller, Lincoln R Sheets

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hunter M PuckettUniversity of Missouri School of Medicine-Columbia, 1 Hospital Dr., MA204 Med. Sci. Bldg, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.
Jenny S BossallerSchool of Information Science & Learning Technologies, College of Education, 303 Townsend Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Lincoln R SheetsUniversity of Missouri School of Medicine-Columbia, 1 Hospital Dr., MA204 Med. Sci. Bldg, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA. sheetslr@health.missouri.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1586-1474
University of Missouri Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a medical condition that has evolved into a serious and deadly epidemic in the United States. Both medical and psychological interventions are called for to end this growing epidemic, but too few health care professionals are trained to treat OUD. One proven model of training physicians and cross-disciplinary teams in treating a variety of disorders is exemplified by Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), a collaborative tele-mentoring program in which specialists train health-care workers to treat medical conditions, especially those that affect underserved populations. This systematic review found that Project ECHO has the potential to effectively extend current services to patients suffering from OUD, but that there is also a gap in knowledge regarding this type of training. The articles that we reviewed all presented evidence that Project ECHO improves healthcare provider preparedness to treat OUD, especially in regard to improving knowledge and self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesModels, EducationalProgram EvaluationHealth PersonnelHumansMentoringOpioid-Related DisordersPhysiciansSpecializationTelemedicineUnited StatesOpioidsOpioid use disorderPhysician outcomesPhysician preparednessProject ECHO

Identifiers

PMID33482906
PMCPMC7821394
OpenAlexW3122675175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.