Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482869›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Supportive care needs of patients with rare chronic diseases: multi-method, cross-sectional study.

Miram K Depping, Natalie Uhlenbusch, Yskert von Kodolitsch, Hans F E Klose, Victor-Felix Mautner, Bernd Löwe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. 'If You Don't Fight for Yourself, No One Else Will': An In-Depth Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Rare Disorder Care Advocacy in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miram K DeppingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany. m.depping@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3205-6060
Natalie UhlenbuschDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Yskert von KodolitschDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hans F E KloseCenter for Oncology, Medical Clinic and Policlinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Victor-Felix MautnerClinic and Policlinic for Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Bernd LöweDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the absence of a cure for the majority of rare diseases, the disease management aims to provide optimal supportive care. The goal of this study was to assess supportive care needs in patients with chronic rare diseases.

methodsCross-sectional mixed-method study was conducted using validated self-report scales and open-ended questions to assess supportive care needs. Participants affected by rare diseases across Germany were contacted via patient organizations and centers for rare diseases. N = 304 participants with 81 different rare diseases completed the study, 81.6% were female, mean age was 44.2 years (SD = 12.8, range 16-74). The quantitative results regarding supportive care needs were compared to a reference population of patients affected by cancer (N = 888). Main outcomes were unmet supportive care needs of patients with rare diseases, as assessed by the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SNCS-SF34) and an open-ended question on support wishes.

resultsPatients with rare diseases did not feel sufficiently supported with regard to psychological support, health system and information, physical and daily living, patient care and support, and sexuality needs. The unmet supportive care needs were significantly higher in the patient sample with rare diseases compared to the SCNS-SF34 reference sample of patients with cancer. 60% of patients with rare diseases did not feel sufficiently socially supported.

conclusionsPatients affected by rare diseases have high unmet support needs in all areas studied. Multidisciplinary care, including psychological support and the provision of information regarding the healthcare system, treatment options, disease course and sexuality, might help address these needs.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandRare DiseasesAdultChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesPatient preferencesPatient reported outcomesPsychosocial supportRare diseasesSupportive care needs

Identifiers

PMID33482869
PMCPMC7825171
OpenAlexW3124220531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.