Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482850›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

Analgesic effect of single-shot ropivacaine at different layers of the surgical site in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled, observer-blinded study.

Qiang Xiao, Bing Xu, Haoyang Wang, Zhenyu Luo, Mingcheng Yuan, Zongke Zhou, Fuxing Pei

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiang Xiao *Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Bing Xu *Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Haoyang WangDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Zhenyu LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Mingcheng YuanDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Zongke ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China. zhouzongke@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-4756
Fuxing PeiDepartment of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan University · CNChengdu Second People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Research & Development program of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province No. 2018SZ0255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a posterolateral approach under general anaesthesia and to compare the efficacy of LIA in all layers with LIA in the deep and superficial fascia. PATIENTS AND

methodsOne hundred twenty patients were randomised into three groups: LIA in the deep and superficial fascia (group A), LIA in all layers (group B) and the control (group C). The primary outcomes were the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and on movement within 72 h (h) postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, range of motion (ROM), straight leg raise completion rate, length of hospital stay, opioid-related side effects and wound complications. We followed the patients until 6 months after discharge.

resultsAt 2 and 6 h, groups A and B had lower resting VAS scores than group C (p < 0.01); at 12 h, group B had a lower resting VAS score than group C (p < 0.05). At 6 and 12 h, the movement VAS scores in groups A and B were lower than those in group C (p < 0.01). Groups A and B had similar VAS scores during the observation period. Groups A and B had higher levels of patient satisfaction than group C (p = 0.03 and p = 0.018, respectively). Opioid consumption was similar in the three groups. There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes amongst the three groups. No difference was found in hip rehabilitation or chronic pain during the follow-up period.

conclusionSingle-shot LIA with ropivacaine alone reduces the pain score during the first 12 postoperative hours and improves patients' satisfaction with THA. LIA in the deep and superficial fascia and LIA in all layers have similar analgesic effects. LIA in the deep and superficial fascia may be an alternative method to LIA in all layers.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainRopivacaineTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineLocal infiltration anaesthesiaPostoperative painTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33482850
PMCPMC7821717
OpenAlexW3125950332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.