Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482795›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Development of a managed clinical network for children's palliative care - a qualitative evaluation.

Andrew Papworth, Lorna Fraser, Jo Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew PapworthMartin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. andrew.papworth@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3244-2634
Lorna FraserDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Jo TaylorDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
University of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2018-11-ST2-002National Institute for Health Research CDF-2018-11-ST2-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsistent evidence suggests that children's palliative care is not equitable and managed clinical networks (MCNs) have been recommended as a solution. This study explored the perspectives of health professionals involved in the development of a children's palliative care MCN, with an aim to identify barriers and enablers of successful implementation.

methodsThematic analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 45 healthcare staff with a role in developing the MCN or in the delivery of children's palliative care (September 2019-March 2020).

resultsThe study explored health professionals' perceptions of the MCN features that had helped to formalise governance processes, establish training and networking opportunities, standardise practice, and improve collaboration between organisations. These include the funded MCN co-ordinator, committed individuals who lead the MCN, and a governance structure that fosters collaboration. However, the MCN's development was impeded by cross-cutting barriers including limited funding for the MCN and children's palliative care more generally, no shared technology, lack of standards and evidence base for children's palliative care, and shortage of palliative care staff. These barriers impacted on the MCN's ability to improve and evaluate palliative care provision and affected member engagement. Competing organisational priorities and differences between NHS and non-NHS members also impeded progress. Training provision was well received, although barriers to access were identified.

conclusionsKey features of children's palliative care can act as barriers to developing a managed clinical network. Managing expectations and raising awareness, providing accessible and relevant training, and sharing early achievements through ongoing evaluation can help to sustain member engagement, which is crucial to a network's success.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareChildFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchChildren’s palliative careManaged clinical network

Identifiers

PMID33482795
PMCPMC7824916
OpenAlexW3124070066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.