Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33482770›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

The NeST (Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer) study: National Practice Questionnaire of United Kingdom multi-disciplinary decision making.

I Whitehead, G W Irwin, F Bannon, C E Coles, E Copson, R I Cutress, R V Dave, M D Gardiner, M Grayson, C Holcombe and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

I WhiteheadRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
G W IrwinBelfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK.
F BannonCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science, Block A, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
C E ColesUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
E CopsonCancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
R I CutressCancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
R V DaveThe Nightingale Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.
M D GardinerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, SL2 4HL, UK.
M GraysonNI Cancer Research Consumer Forum, c/o NI Cancer Trials Network, East Podium, C-Floor, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK.
C HolcombeLiverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
S IrshadGuy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
C O'BrienThe Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 2BX, UK.
R L O'ConnellRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
C PalmieriUniversity of Liverpool, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
A M ShaabanQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.
N SharmaBreast Unit, Level 1 Chancellor wing, St James Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS97TF, UK.
J K SinghQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK.
S PotterBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
S A McIntoshPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK. s.mcintosh@qub.ac.uk.
NeST Study Research Collaborative
Queen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBAintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBThe Christie Hospital · GBThe Northern Ireland Cancer Centre · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBWexham Park Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24869Department of Health NIHR300024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer, yet it is clear that there is significant geographical variation in its use in the UK. This study aimed to examine stated practice across UK breast units, in terms of indications for use, radiological monitoring, pathological reporting of treatment response, and post-treatment surgical management.

methodsMultidisciplinary teams (MDTs) from all UK breast units were invited to participate in the NeST study. A detailed questionnaire assessing current stated practice was distributed to all participating units in December 2017 and data collated securely usingREDCap. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each questionnaire item.

resultsThirty-nine MDTs from a diverse range of hospitals responded. All MDTs routinely offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to a median of 10% (range 5-60%) of patients. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was offered to a median of 4% (range 0-25%) of patients by 66% of MDTs. The principal indication given for use of neoadjuvant therapy was for surgical downstaging. There was no consensus on methods of radiological monitoring of response, and a wide variety of pathological reporting systems were used to assess tumour response. Twenty-five percent of centres reported resecting the original tumour footprint, irrespective of clinical/radiological response. Radiologically negative axillae at diagnosis routinely had post-NACT or post-NET sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in 73.0 and 84% of centres respectively, whereas 16% performed SLNB pre-NACT. Positive axillae at diagnosis would receive axillary node clearance at 60% of centres, regardless of response to NACT. DISCUSSION: There is wide variation in the stated use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy across the UK, with general low usage of NET. Surgical downstaging remains the most common indication of the use of NAC, although not all centres leverage the benefits of NAC for de-escalating surgery to the breast and/or axilla. There is a need for agreed multidisciplinary guidance for optimising selection and management of patients for NST. These findings will be corroborated in phase II of the NeST study which is a national collaborative prospective audit of NST utilisation and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInterdisciplinary CommunicationNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomBreast cancerChemotherapyEndocrine therapyNeoadjuvant treatmentSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33482770
PMCPMC7825231
OpenAlexW3116588722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.