Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2021
Antifungal stewardship in a tertiary care paediatric hospital: the PROAFUNGI study.
Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis in paediatrics: a systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- Irrational and Inappropriate Use of Antifungals in the NICU: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antifungal Stewardship in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Time is of the Essence.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Antifungal Prescription and Stewardship in Pediatrics.Mycopathologia · 2025Review
- Antifungal use and appropriateness: a study of Australian Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey data.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
- Promoting antifungal stewardship through an antifungal multidisciplinary team in a paediatric and adult tertiary centre in the UK.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- Five-Year Evaluation of the PROA-NEN Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Impact of Antifungal Stewardship on Clinical and Performance Measures: A Global Systematic Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
- Antifungal stewardship in practice: Insights from a prospective audit and feedback program.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
- Liposomal amphotericin B-the present.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing use of antifungal drugs (AF) in children and the concern for related adverse events and costs has led to the development of specific AF stewardship programmes (AFS). Studies in adult patients have shown improvements in AF prescription and usage after implementation, but paediatric data are scant. The aim of this PROAFUNGI study was to describe the use and appropriateness of AF in a high complexity paediatric centre.
methodsObservational, prospective, single-centre, modified point-prevalence study (11 surveys, July-October 2018), including paediatric (< 18 years) patients receiving at least one systemic AF. Prescriptions were evaluated by the AFS team.
resultsThe study included 119 prescriptions in 55 patients (53% males, median age 8.7 years [IQR 2.4-13.8]). The main underlying condition was cancer (45.5% of patients; HSCT in 60% of them); and the first indication for AF was prophylaxis (75 prescriptions, 63.2%). Liposomal amphotericin B was used most commonly (46% prescriptions), mainly as prophylaxis (75%). Among the 219 evaluations, 195 (89%) were considered optimal. The reason for non-optimal prescriptions was mostly lack of indication (14/24), especially in critical patients with ventricular assist devices. The use of AF without paediatric approval accounted for 8/24 inappropriate prescriptions.
conclusionsA high rate of AF appropriateness was found for the children's hospital as a whole, in relation with a well-established AFS. Nonetheless, the identification of specific areas of improvement should guide future actions of the AFS team, which will focus mainly on prophylaxis in critically ill patients receiving circulatory assistance and the use of non-approved drugs in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.