Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481989›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2021

Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in People With Stroke.

Bryant A Seamon, Steven A Kautz, Craig A Velozo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bryant A SeamonRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Steven A KautzRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Craig A VelozoDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS)R01NS050506 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DUNCAN, PAMELA W. · 2005 to 2009
$13.3M
RR&D Research Career Scientist Award ApplicationIK6RX003075 · VA · RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2020 to 2025
–
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050506RRD VA I01 RX001935RRD VA IK6 RX003075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdministrative burden often prevents clinical assessment of balance confidence in people with stroke. A computerized adaptive test (CAT) version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC CAT) can dramatically reduce this burden. The objective of this study was to test balance confidence measurement precision and efficiency in people with stroke with an ABC CAT.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional, simulation study with data from 406 adults approximately 2 months post-stroke in the Locomotor-Experience Applied Post-Stroke trial. Item parameters for CAT calibration were estimated with the Rasch model using a random sample of participants (n = 203). Computer simulation was used with response data from the remaining 203 participants to evaluate the ABC CAT algorithm under varying stopping criteria. We compared estimated levels of balance confidence from each simulation to actual levels predicted from the Rasch model (Pearson correlations and mean standard error [SE]).

resultsResults from simulations with number of items as a stopping criterion strongly correlated with actual ABC scores (full item, r = 1, 12-item, r = 0.994; 8-item, r = 0.98; 4-item, r = 0.929). Mean SE increased with decreasing number of items administered (full item, SE = 0.31; 12 item, SE = 0.33; 8 item, SE = 0.38; 4 item, SE = 0.49). A precision-based stopping rule (mean SE = 0.5) also strongly correlated with actual ABC scores (r = 0.941) and optimized the relationship between number of items administrated with precision (mean number of items 4.37, range [4-9]).

conclusionAn ABC CAT can determine accurate and precise measures of balance confidence in people with stroke with as few as 4 items. Individuals with lower balance confidence may require a greater number of items (up to 9) which could be attributed to the Locomotor-Experience Applied Post-Stroke trial excluding more functionally impaired persons. IMPACT: Computerized adaptive testing can drastically reduce the ABC test's administration time while maintaining accuracy and precision. This should greatly enhance clinical utility, facilitating adoption of clinical practice guidelines in stroke rehabilitation. LAY SUMMARY: If you have had a stroke, your physical therapist will likely test your balance confidence. A CAT version of the ABC scale can accurately identify balance with as few as 4 questions, which takes much less time.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesBalanceMeasurement—AppliedStroke

Identifiers

PMID33481989
PMCPMC8023552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.