Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481957›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Cross-cultural perception of female facial appearance: A multi-ethnic and multi-centre study.

Rainer Voegeli, Rotraut Schoop, Elodie Prestat-Marquis, Anthony V Rawlings, Todd K Shackelford, Bernhard Fink

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05945472 (Mental Beauty, the Unexplored Impact of Cosmetics on Mood, Personal Self-esteem, Perceived Stress, Mindfulness and Psychological Well-being.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05945472 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Mental Beauty, the Unexplored Impact of Cosmetics on Mood, Personal Self-esteem, Perceived Stress, Mindfulness and Psychological Well-being.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria AragónRan2022 to 2023Enrolled150ConditionsSelf Esteem, Psychological Well-being, Stress, Physiological, MoodArmsPositive reinforcement method, Standard method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rainer VoegeliDSM Nutritional Products, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3951-0329
Rotraut SchoopDSM Nutritional Products, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Elodie Prestat-MarquisNewtone Technologies, Lyon, France.
Anthony V RawlingsAVR Consulting Ltd, Northwich, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
Todd K ShackelfordDepartment of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, United States of America.
Bernhard FinkBiosocial Science Information, Biedermannsdorf, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans extract and use information from the face in assessments of physical appearance. Previous research indicates high agreement about facial attractiveness within and between cultures. However, the use of a narrow age range for facial stimuli, limitations due to unidirectional cross-cultural comparisons, and technical challenges have prevented definitive conclusions about the universality of face perception. In the present study, we imaged the faces of women aged 20 to 69 years in five locations (China, France, India, Japan, and South Africa) and secured age, attractiveness, and health assessments on continuous scales (0-100) from female and male raters (20-66 years) within and across ethnicity. In total, 180 images (36 of each ethnicity) were assessed by 600 raters (120 of each ethnicity), recruited in study centres in the five locations. Linear mixed model analysis revealed main and interaction effects of assessor ethnicity, assessor gender, and photographed participant ("face") ethnicity on age, attractiveness, and health assessments. Thus, differences in judgments of female facial appearance depend on the ethnicity of the photographed person, the ethnicity of the assessor, and whether the assessor is female or male. Facial age assessments correlated negatively with attractiveness and health assessments. Collectively, these findings provide evidence of cross-cultural variation in assessments of age, and even more of attractiveness, and health, indicating plasticity in perception of female facial appearance across cultures, although the decline in attractiveness and health assessments with age is universally found.

Indexed as

BeautyFacial ExpressionJudgmentPerceptionAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33481957
PMCPMC7822532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.