Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

How maternity waiting home use influences attendance of antenatal and postnatal care.

Julie M Buser, Michelle L Munro-Kramer, Philip T Veliz, Xingyu Zhang, Nancy Lockhart, Godfrey Biemba, Thandiwe Ngoma, Nancy Scott, Jody R Lori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julie M BuserMichigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-0710
Michelle L Munro-KramerDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Philip T VelizDepartment of Systems, Populations and Leadership, Applied Biostatistics Laboratory, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Xingyu ZhangDepartment of Systems, Populations and Leadership, Applied Biostatistics Laboratory, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Nancy LockhartDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Godfrey BiembaNational Health Research Authority, Lusaka, Zambia.
Thandiwe NgomaZambian Center for Applied Health Research and Development (ZCAHRD) Limited, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nancy ScottDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-4642
Jody R LoriDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As highlighted in the International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife, access to quality nursing and midwifery care is essential to promote maternal-newborn health and improve survival. One intervention aimed at improving maternal-newborn health and reducing underutilization of pregnancy services is the construction of maternity waiting homes (MWHs). The purpose of this study was to assess whether there was a significant change in antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) attendance, family planning use, and vaccination rates before and after implementation of the Core MWH Model in rural Zambia. A quasi-experimental controlled before-and-after design was used to evaluate the impact of the Core MWH Model by assessing associations between ANC and PNC attendance, family planning use, and vaccination rates for mothers who gave birth to a child in the past 13 months. Twenty health care facilities received the Core MWH Model and 20 were identified as comparison facilities. Before-and-after community surveys were carried out. Multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association between Core MWH Model use and ANC and PNC attendance. The total sample includes 4711 mothers. Mothers who used the Core MWH Model had better ANC and PNC attendance, family planning use, and vaccination rates than mothers who did not use a MWH. All mothers appeared to fare better across these outcomes at endline. We found an association between Core MWH Model use and better ANC and PNC attendance, family planning use, and newborn vaccination outcomes. Maternity waiting homes may serve as a catalyst to improve use of facility services for vulnerable mothers.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRural Health ServicesRural PopulationZambia

Identifiers

PMID33481942
PMCPMC7822518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.