Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The benefits of action to reduce household air pollution (BAR-HAP) model: A new decision support tool.

Ipsita Das, Jessica J Lewis, Ramona Ludolph, Melanie Bertram, Heather Adair-Rohani, Marc Jeuland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Voucher-based liquefied petroleum gas subsidies achieve nearly exclusive clean fuel use when affordable delivery is available.Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative · 2025
    Article
  4. Energy-poverty-inequality SDGs: A large-scale household analysis and forecasting in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Resilient clean cooking: Maintaining household clean cooking in Ecuador during the COVID-19 pandemic.Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ipsita DasSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-6051
Jessica J LewisDepartment of Environment, Climate Change and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ramona LudolphDepartment of Environment, Climate Change and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Melanie BertramDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Heather Adair-RohaniDepartment of Environment, Climate Change and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marc JeulandSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-2622

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooking with polluting and inefficient fuels and technologies is responsible for a large set of global harms, ranging from health and time losses among the billions of people who are energy poor, to environmental degradation at a regional and global scale. This paper presents a new decision-support model-the BAR-HAP Tool-that is aimed at guiding planning of policy interventions to accelerate transitions towards cleaner cooking fuels and technologies. The conceptual model behind BAR-HAP lies in a framework of costs and benefits that is holistic and comprehensive, allows consideration of multiple policy interventions (subsidies, financing, bans, and behavior change communication), and realistically accounts for partial adoption and use of improved cooking technology. It incorporates evidence from recent efforts to characterize the relevant set of parameters that determine those costs and benefits, including those related to intervention effectiveness. Practical aspects of the tool were modified based on feedback from a pilot testing workshop with multisectoral users in Nepal. To demonstrate the functionality of the BAR-HAP tool, we present illustrative calculations related to several cooking transitions in the context of Nepal. In accounting for the multifaceted nature of the issue of household air pollution, the BAR-HAP model is expected to facilitate cross-sector dialogue and problem-solving to address this major health, environment and development challenge.

Indexed as

CookingDecision MakingFamily CharacteristicsModels, TheoreticalAir Pollution, IndoorHumansNepal

Identifiers

PMID33481916
PMCPMC7822293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.