Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481896›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Bias evaluation and reduction in 3D OP-OSEM reconstruction in dynamic equilibrium PET studies with 11C-labeled for binding potential analysis.

Cláudia Régio Brambilla, Jürgen Scheins, Ahlam Issa, Lutz Tellmann, Hans Herzog, Elena Rota Kops, N Jon Shah, Irene Neuner, Christoph W Lerche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cláudia Régio BrambillaInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3735-8511
Jürgen ScheinsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Ahlam IssaInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Lutz TellmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1154-2847
Hans HerzogInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Elena Rota KopsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
N Jon ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Irene NeunerInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Christoph W LercheInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iterative image reconstruction is widely used in positron emission tomography. However, it is known to contribute to quantitation bias and is particularly pronounced during dynamic studies with 11C-labeled radiotracers where count rates become low towards the end of the acquisition. As the strength of the quantitation bias depends on the counts in the reconstructed frame, it can differ from frame to frame of the acquisition. This is especially relevant in the case of neuro-receptor studies with simultaneous PET/MR when a bolus-infusion protocol is applied to allow the comparison of pre- and post-task effects. Here, count dependent changes in quantitation bias may interfere with task changes. We evaluated the impact of different framing schemes on quantitation bias and its propagation into binding potential (BP) using a phantom decay study with 11C and 3D OP-OSEM. Further, we propose a framing scheme that keeps the true counts per frame constant over the acquisition time as constant framing schemes and conventional increasing framing schemes are unlikely to achieve stable bias values during the acquisition time range. For a constant framing scheme with 5 minutes frames, the BP bias was 7.13±2.01% (10.8% to 3.8%) compared to 5.63±2.85% (7.8% to 4.0%) for conventional increasing framing schemes. Using the proposed constant true counts framing scheme, a stabilization of the BP bias was achieved at 2.56±3.92% (3.5% to 1.7%). The change in BP bias was further studied by evaluating the linear slope during the acquisition time interval. The lowest slope values were observed in the constant true counts framing scheme. The constant true counts framing scheme was effective for BP bias stabilization at relevant activity and time ranges. The mean BP bias under these conditions was 2.56±3.92%, which represents the lower limit for the detection of changes in BP during equilibrium and is especially important in the case of cognitive tasks where the expected changes are low.

Indexed as

Carbon RadioisotopesPositron-Emission TomographyImaging, Three-DimensionalIsotope LabelingPhantoms, ImagingCarbon-11Carbon Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID33481896
PMCPMC7822533
OpenAlexW3123064806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.