Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481835›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A total blood volume or more transfused during pregnancy or after childbirth: Individual patient data from six international population-based observational studies.

Stephen J McCall, Dacia Henriquez, Hellen McKinnon Edwards, Thomas van den Akker, Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, Johanna van der Bom, Marie-Pierre Bonnet, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Serena Donati, Ada Gillissen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Stephen J McCallNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0078-7010
Dacia HenriquezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hellen McKinnon EdwardsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Thomas van den AkkerNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kitty W M BloemenkampDepartment of Obstetrics, Birth Centre Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Johanna van der BomJon J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research & Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Marie-Pierre BonnetDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2055-8813
Catherine Deneux-TharauxINSERM U1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Research Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (CRESS), Paris University, Paris, France.
Serena DonatiNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Ada GillissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jennifer J KurinczukNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-6337
Zhuoyang LiFaculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Alice MaraschiniNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Aurélien SecoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Elizabeth SullivanFaculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Simon StanworthOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Haematology, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Leiden University · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBInserm · FRIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUDélégation Paris 5 · FRHerlev Hospital · DKLeiden University Medical Center · NLNHS Blood and Transplant · GBWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare incidence, management and outcomes of women transfused their blood volume or more within 24 hours during pregnancy or following childbirth.

methodsCombined analysis of individual patient data, prospectively collected in six international population-based studies (France, United Kingdom, Italy, Australia, the Netherlands and Denmark). Massive transfusion in major obstetric haemorrhage was defined as transfusion of eight or more units of red blood cells within 24 hours in a pregnant or postpartum woman. Causes, management and outcomes of women with massive transfusion were compared across countries using descriptive statistics.

findingsThe incidence of massive transfusion was approximately 21 women per 100,000 maternities for the United Kingdom, Australia and Italy; by contrast Denmark, the Netherlands and France had incidences of 82, 66 and 69 per 100,000 maternities, respectively. There was large variation in obstetric and haematological management across countries. Fibrinogen products were used in 86% of women in Australia, while the Netherlands and Italy reported lower use at 35-37% of women. Tranexamic acid was used in 75% of women in the Netherlands, but in less than half of women in the UK, Australia and Italy. In all countries, women received large quantities of colloid/crystalloid fluids during resuscitation (>3·5 litres). There was large variation in the use of compression sutures, embolisation and hysterectomy across countries. There was no difference in maternal mortality; however, variable proportions of women had cardiac arrests, renal failure and thrombotic events from 0-16%.

interpretationThere was considerable variation in the incidence of massive transfusion associated with major obstetric haemorrhage across six high-income countries. There were also large disparities in both transfusion and obstetric management between these countries. There is a requirement for detailed evaluation of evidence underlying current guidance. Furthermore, cross-country comparison may empower countries to reference their clinical care against that of other countries.

Indexed as

InternationalityObservational Studies as TopicAdultBlood TransfusionData CollectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33481835
PMCPMC7822517
OpenAlexW3119510812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.