Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33481817›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Clinical and pharmacokinetic/dynamic outcomes of prolonged infusions of beta-lactam antimicrobials: An overview of systematic reviews.

Pierre Thabet, Anchal Joshi, Erika MacDonald, Brian Hutton, Wei Cheng, Adrienne Stevens, Salmaan Kanji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam againstJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Timing of antibiotic therapy in the ICU.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre ThabetThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anchal JoshiUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Erika MacDonaldThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Brian HuttonOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Wei ChengOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Adrienne StevensMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Salmaan KanjiThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0594-0360
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis overview of reviews aims to map and compare of objectives, methods, and findings of existing systematic reviews to develop a greater understanding of the information available about prolonged beta-lactam infusions in hospitalized patients with infection.

designOverview of systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PROSPERO and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January, 1990 to June, 2019 using a peer reviewed search strategy. Grey literature was also searched for relevant reviews. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING REVIEWS: Systematic reviews were sought that compared two or more infusion strategies for intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobials and report clinical cure or mortality. Populations of included reviews were restricted to hospitalized patients with infection, without restrictions on age, infection type, or disease. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Abstract screening, data extraction, quality and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Overlap between reviews was assessed using a modified corrected covered area. Overview findings are reported in accordance with Cochrane's recommendation for overview conduct. Clinical outcomes extracted included survival, clinical cure, treatment failure, microbiological cure, length of stay, adverse events, cost, and emergence of resistance.

resultsThe search strategy identified 3327 unique citations from which 21 eligible reviews were included. Reviews varied by population, intervention and outcomes studied. Between reviews, overlap of primary studies was generally high, methodologic quality generally low and risk of bias variable. Nine of 14 reviews that quantitatively evaluated mortality and clinical cure identified a benefit with prolonged infusions of beta lactams when compared with intermittent infusions. Evidence of mortality and clinical cure benefit was greater among critically ill patients when compared to less sick patients and lower in randomized controlled trials when compared with observational studies.

conclusionsFindings from our review demonstrate a consistent and reproducible lack of harm with prolonged infusions of beta-lactam antibiotics with variability in effect size and significance of benefits. Despite 21 systematic reviews addressing prolonged infusions of beta-lactams, this overview supports the continued need for a definitive systematic review given variability in populations, interventions and outcomes in the current systematic reviews. Subsequent systematic reviews should have more rigorous and transparent methods, only include RCTs and evaluate the proposed benefits found in various subgroup-analyses-i.e. high risk of mortality.

trial registrationProspero registry, CRD42019117118.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Infectionsbeta-LactamsHumansInfusions, IntravenousSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID33481817
PMCPMC7822342
OpenAlexW3125727119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.